Consequences of near-death experiences

P.  M. H. Atwater writes: “we can examine the extent to which the near-death survivor was affected by what happened to him or her. Here’s what we’ve discovered so far . . . 

   21 percent claimed no discernible differences afterward.

   60 percent reported significant life changes.

  19 percent noted radical shifts—almost as if they had become another person.

“On the plus side: A sense of love and forgiveness, a spiritual strength, empowered the majority to make strikingly positive changes in their lives. Latent talents readily surface, coupled with an unusual increase in intellect and hunger for knowledge. Enhanced creative and intuitive abilities, a deep desire for classical or melodious music, and a dedication to service were commonplace—many entered the public sector as reforms or agents for change.

“What hallucination, temporal lobe seizure, or drug or laboratory-induced episode can match the depth of this response?

"The burden of proof remains with the debunkers. Evidence for authenticity clearly rests on the side of researchers and near-death experiencers.”

Atwater notes that the following health care professionals, among many others, have accepted the reality of near-death experiences:

Diane Corcoran, BSN (Nursing), MA (Education and Psychology, Ph.D. (Management). In 2000 25 years in the Army, Vietnam veteran.

Maggie Callanan, RN, CRNH (Certified Registered Hospice Nurse, Hospice nurse 1980-2000). In 1995 received the National Hospice Organization’s ‘Heart of Hospice’ award.

Debbie James, MSN, RN, CNS (Critical Care Learning Specialist). As of 2000, 23 years in critical care nursing. 1999 Excellence in Education award recipient from the American Association of Critical Care Nurses.

Kimberly Clark Sharp, MSW (Social Work). Many awards for community involvement; research on NDEs and assisted Dr. Melvin Morse in his work, author of After the Light: What I Discovered on the Other Side of Life That Can Change Your World.

P.  M. H. Atwater  with David H. Morgan. The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Near-Death Experiences (Alpha Books), 121-122.

 

Experiencing God as The One True Light

Near-death survivor P. M. H. Atwater writes: “The vast majority of adults in any country see God/Allah/Deity as a formless, shapeless brilliance so powerful and so strong and so magnificent that Its Beingness is felt as if a power voltage equivalent to 10,000 suns. You’re instantly ‘fried,’ yet there is no pain, nothing negative or hurtful. The present of this Light is associated with Deity. And this Light knows your name, knows all about you, can converse with you answer questions, and give guidance. There’s nothing this Light doesn’t know, especially the things you don’t.

"And this Light loves you and forgives you, but can be cryptic in the giving of mission and what next needs to be done to heal, help, and uplift self and others. You cannot fool this Light, nor can you hide or pretend in Its Presence. Other-worldly guides and guardians, angels and greeters of every strip, can appear, too, and ‘fill in the blanks’ for you if you missed anything.

“There is an undeniable electrical component to near-death experiences and the aftereffects that spring from them. Here’s a ‘for instance’: the electromagnetic field in and around experiencers alters afterward, with displays of electrical sensitivity becoming common place.

“Pardon me, but isn’t that what near-death, mystical, spiritual, and religious experiencers have claimed for centuries? That the Light of Enlightenment is actually, that, literally a waking up to the Light, an illumination of Light, a reunification with The One True Light. And there are groups, isms and schisms, that decree how people can reach such a state of enlightened knowingness. The rules are many, the pathways numerous, still, the goal is always the same . . . union with the source of your being . . . God!

“You know the Light is God. No one has to tell you. You know.

“You can no longer believe in God afterward, for belief implies doubt. There is no more doubt. None. You now know God. And you know that you know. And you’re never the same again.

“And you know who you are . . . a child of God, a cell in The Greater Body, and extension of The One Force, an expression from The One Mind. No more can you forget your identity, or deny or ignore or pretend it away.

“There is One, and you are of The One. One. The Light does this to you. It cradles your soul in the heart of its pulse-beat and fills you with love shine. And you melt away as the ‘you’ you think you are, reforming as the “YOU’ you really are, and you are reborn because at last you remember.

“Although not everyone speaks of God when they return from death’s door as I have here, the majority do. And almost to a person they begin to make references to oneness, allness, isnss as the directive presence behind and within and beyond all things.

“I’ve noticed that although God never changes, God is forever changing. As our perceptions alter, as personal experience trumps what we thought we knew, the name of God can and often does undergo a ‘make-over.’”

P. M. H. Atwater, Dying to Know You: Proof of God in the Near Death Experience (Rainbow Ridge Books, 2014), 9-12.

A Soviet dissident's powers when "dead" and alive

P. M. H. Atwater, a survivor of three near-death experiences, tells the story of George Rodonaia, a vocal Soviet dissident during the Cold War who had earned his master’s degree in research psychology and was working toward his doctorate when he was assassinated by the KGB. He felt the pain of being crushed beneath car wheels as he was run over twice by the same vehicle. But what bothered him most was the feeling of an unknown darkness that came to envelop him.

“As he focused on what was occurring, he was surprised to discover the range and power of this thoughts and what he could do with them. A pinprick of light appeared, then bubbles like balls of molecules and atoms, life-making cells moving in spirals, revealing to him higher and higher levels of power with God as the highest. He found he could project himself anywhere on earth he wanted to go and experience what was there, and that he could do the same thing regarding events in history. Being extremely curious, he did just that, amusing himself by projecting invisibly into various time and places to find out what he’d see and learn. Among other things he discovered that he could get inside people’s heads and hear and see what they did.

“He returned to the morgue, saw his body, then was drawn to the newborn section of the adjacent hospital where a friend’s wife had just given birth to a daughter. The baby cried incessantly. As if possessed of x-ray vision, George scanned her body and noted that her hip had been broken shortly after birth (a nurse had dropped her). He ‘spoke’ to the infant and told her not to cry, as no one would understand her. The infant was so surprised at his presence that she stopped crying. He claims that children can see and hear spirit beings; that’s why she responded. He then had a past-life review that involved reliving not only his own life, but the death of his parents at the hands of the KGB—something he had not known as he’d been raised by relatives who had withheld the truth about what happened to his mother and father.

“George’s corpse was stored in a freezer vault in a hospital morgue for three days (he doesn’t know what the exact temperature was). He revived while the trunk of his body was being split open during autopsy. The shock of seeing this sent the physician in charge screaming from the unit. (His own uncle was one of the doctors in attendance.) All his ribs were broken, his muscles destroyed, his feet a horrible mess. It took three days before the swelling in his tongue went down enough for him to speak. His first words warned the doctors about the child with the broken hip. X-rays of the newborn were taken, and he was proved right. During the nine months he was hospitalized, he became something of a celebrity.

“For a year afterward, his wife, Nino, would not sleep in the same room with him. She had great difficulty dealing with his miraculous return and the fact that he had correctly ‘seen’ everything she had while selecting his gravesite—even quoting back to her all her thoughts when she was considering other men to marry now that she was a widow. I asked Nino about this, and she said, ‘How would you like it if you had no privacy, not even in your own mind?’"

P. M. H. Atwater with David H. Morgan. The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Near-Death Experiences (Indianapolis, IN: Alpha Books, 2000), 161-62.

Sharing self-forgetting is like a glimpse of heaven

Daniel Tammet is an autistic savant, essayist, novelist, poet, and author of an autobiographical account, Born on a Blue Day. The American Library Association in 2008 praised the book about his life with the Asberger syndrome as a "Best Book for Young Adults."

"Many people are surprised when they learn that I am a Christian. They imagine that being autistic makes it difficult or impossible to believe in God or explore spiritual issues. It is certainly true that my Asperger’s makes it harder for me to have empathy or think abstractly, but it hasn’t prevented me from thinking about deeper questions concerning such things as life and death, love and relationships. In fact, many people with autism do find benefits in religious belief or spirituality. Religion’s emphasis on ritual, for example, is helpful for individuals with autistic spectrum disorders, who benefit greatly from stability and consistency. In a chapter of her autobiography entitled “Stairway to Heaven; Religion and Belief,” Temple Grandin, an autistic writer and professor of animal science, describes her view of God as an ordering force in the universe. Her religious beliefs stem from her experience of working in the slaughter industry and the feeling she had that there must be something sacred about dying."

"Like many people with autism, my religious activity is primarily intellectual rather than social or emotional. When I was at secondary school, I had no interest in religious education and was dismissive of the possibility of a god or that religion could be beneficial in people’s lives. This was because God was not something that I could see or hear or feel, and because the religious arguments that I read and heard did not make any sense to me. The turning point came with my discovery of the writings of G. K. Chesterton, an English journalist who wrote extensively about his Christians beliefs in the early part of the twentieth century."

"Chesterton was a remarkable person. At school, his teachers described him as a dreamer and ‘not on the same plane as the rest,’ while as a teenager he set up a debating club with friends, sometimes arguing an idea for hours at a time . . .. He could quote whole chapters of Dickens and other authors from memory and remembered the plots of all the 10,000 novels he had evaluated as a publisher’s reader. His secretaries reported that he would dictate one essay while simultaneously writing another by hand on a different subject. Yet he was always getting lost, so absorbed in his thoughts that he would sometimes have to phone his wife to help him get back home.”

“Reading Chesterton as a teenager helped me to arrive at an intellectual understanding of God and Christianity. The concept of the Trinity, of God as composed of living and loving relationships, was something that I could picture in my head and that made sense to me. I was also fascinated by the idea of the Incarnation, of God revealing Himself to the world in tangible, human form as Jesus Christ. Even so, it was not until I was twenty-three that I decided to participate in a course at a local church . . .. At Christmas in 2002 I became a Christian."

"My autism can sometimes make it difficult for me to understand how other people might think or feel in any given situation. For this reason, my moral values are based more on ideas that are logical, make sense to me and that I have thought through carefully, than on the ability to ‘walk in another person’s shoes.’ I know to treat each person I meet with kindness and respect, because I believe that each person is unique and created in God’s image."

“There are many beautiful and inspiring passages in the Bible, but my favorite is the following from 1 Corinthians: “Love is patient . . .. So faith, hope and love abide these three. But the greatest of these is love.”

With his gay partner Neil, Daniel write with Neil: “All of a sudden I experienced a kind of self-forgetting and in that brief, shining moment all my anxiety and awkwardness seemed to disappear. I turned to Neil and asked him if he had felt the same sensation and he said he had.” Like a “glimpse of heaven.”

Daniel Tammet, Born on a Blue Day: Inside the Extraordinary Mind of an Autistic Savant (Free Press, 2006), 223-226.

Only our selfless characteristics will endure

Astrophysicist David Darling writes: “Those who have come close to death have, as it were, poked their noses into this greater world beyond human life. They have felt, briefly, incompletely, what it is like to be free of self and in contact with the absolute nature of things. No hallucination or fit of delirium could generate such an experience. Rather, it is ordinary life that, by comparison, begins to take on the air of unreality.

“The message is clear: if we can learn to see through the illusion of self now, in this life, then the ‘I’ who can die no longer exists. Death is deprived of its victim, so that the basis for fear and sorrow of death is undermined. We become part of a much larger process―the totality of being―that has no start or end.

“The scientist within us may rail at this and demand, ‘How can there be any sort of life after death? How can consciousness exist without a brain?’ But we can see now that these questions stem from a failure to grasp the true nature of consciousness and the brain. Better surely to ask, ‘How can there be consciousness with a brain?’

“We see the world as being full of relatively stable objects, such as trees and rocks and ourselves. But there is no stability anywhere, not even for a microsecond. Only our minds create that illusion. There are no trees, only a tree-air-earth-sun-cosmos process that never stands still. There are no people, only a people-air-food-cosmos process that is forever breathing, digesting and growing, breaking down and healing itself. There are no objects or things at all, but just one great interconnected system that is the whole of reality. All the world is a living, dynamic movement—continuous change and impermanence its only genuine characteristics.

“It is no coincidence that behavior which people everywhere consider intrinsically good―generosity to our fellow humans, working for the benefit of others, valuing all forms of life―serves also to lessen our preoccupation with self and to encourage the realization that we are part of an undivided unity. Only when there is no self left, is there no one who can die.

“Only those aspects of us that are selfless―qualities we might put under the unifying heading of ‘love’―will endure.

“Death is to be welcomed, when in due course it draws near, for with it we shall be freed from our terrible isolation. It is the one event that draws us all together again, back into the single true mind of the universe. Death is not a failure or a finality, but a triumph and the start of an experience we can hardly begin to imagine in our present form.

“Proper, spiritual preparation for death involves a dedicated search for the true nature of reality. And that, in turn, calls for a lifelong voyage of discovery into consciousness without self.

“Each to his or her own. There are many ways to break through the illusionary world of the rational mind. Prayer, charity, music, poetry―a million different roads.

“Only by pursuing a life course that diminishes our obsession with self, with material and emotional ‘me-ness,’ can we gain the deeper insights needed to face death with equanimity. A wonderful future lies ahead of us, following the trial of death, but not as individuals. In store is nothing less than a grand reunion with reality, an expansion of consciousness that can only occasionally be glimpsed through the dim portals of our senses and brain.”

David J. Darling, Soul Search: A Scientist Explores the Afterlife (Villard, 1995), 168-187.

Consciousness is irreducible; brains build models

“We are brought up in the West today to believe that the brain is a creator of thought, a producer―or at least an agent in the production―of consciousness. We are indoctrinated into the materialist belief that the mental world is merely a superficial, almost superfluous outgrowth of the physical. But now, in the light of NDEs, we must forcefully challenge that view. From those who have skirted death comes this extraordinary new evidence suggesting that cognition may actually broaden and become more profound at exactly the time the brain stops working. How is that possible?

“It is not simply that scientists have failed to explain consciousness, they have failed (in the main) to see that such an explanation is not even possible. Today’s prevailing view that subjective experiences arise spontaneously when certain physical systems (such as brains and, perhaps, computers) get complicated enough is fundamentally misguided. It stems from our habit of seeing the world dualistically―as having separate subjective and objective aspects. But in reality there is no such separation.

“Science starts from the assumption that there is a knowable logic to the universe―which there clearly is. It then strips away all aspects of the world that logic cannot tease apart, calling these subjective. There is nothing wrong with this―science couldn’t progress in any other way. The mistake is to assume that this separation of objective from subjective, which we choose to make, reflects how things really are. It does not. And this misunderstanding is now becoming very clear as scientists go beyond their own remit and try to explain consciousness as a derivative of brain function. Their failure is no surprise.

“Consciousness is not some side-effect, or epiphenomenon, of the objective world. It is an integral, irreducible part of reality. Consciousness is the subjective aspect of all things―the ever-present ‘mind’ of the universe.

“Most, if not all, the major organs of the body are regulators. The lungs don’t manufacture the air our bodies need; the stomach and intestines are not food-producers. So, if we manufacture neither the air we breathe nor the food we eat, why assume that we make, rather than regulate, what we think?

“Seen as a reducing valve, the brain is a mixed blessing. Without it, human beings would never have evolved. The brain shields us from an awareness of every little thing, letting through only those experiences that are relevant to our survival. On the other hand, the brain prevents us from being directly in touch with reality. It is the barrier that stands between us and the limitless potential of the universe.

“We may be supremely self-conscious, but for this very reason our awareness of reality is surprisingly limited.

“All other living creatures are more conscious than us, if by this we mean they interfere less with the totality of experience available to them. With inanimate objects, the distinction between the individual―the self―and the unity of everything breaks down completely. So, the bewildering paradox emerges that inert matter can be considered more conscious than anything that lives, while human beings are the least conscious creatures of all!

“Such a conclusion seems unreasonable. But that is only because it runs counter to the completely false picture of the world we normally uphold. We are the ones who invent the myth of objects and phenomena, of separation and selfhood. None of this really exists. Everything we experience through our rationalizing minds is an illusion. So what does it mean to say that a rock is more conscious than a person? Simply that what it is like to be a rock is the same as what it is like to be the whole universe, because outside of the human mind there is no differentiation.

“Our brains, far from being prerequisites for conscious thought, reduce the ever-present torrent of total subjective experience to a carefully moderated trickle. They condense the infinite, unbroken cosmos down to an extraordinarily parochial world that seems to revolve around the individual.

“The brain builds models. Then these models are projected outward, creating the appearance of ‘things’ and ‘happenings’ beyond the senses. But these phenomena are not objectively real. We see only our own confabulations― sophisticated falsehoods that include elements of experience as fundamental as our selves, our perceptions of moving time and our anxiety at the prospect of death.

“Brains improve the survival chances of the organic structures that encase them. They assist with the four F’s―fighting, fleeing, feeding and mating. And they do this by restricting and rescripting consciousness to just that paltry form needed to maximize our chances of staying alive.

“If we can readjust to the idea that consciousness exists only outside the mental world of the brain, then death no longer appears as the ultimate tragedy.

“Death is the breaking of a spell, the waking from a dream. In this alternative paradigm, consciousness is there all the time, all around us―in the trees, the earth, the sky, and the emptiness of space. It is there, waiting for us to rejoin it.”

David J. Darling, Soul Search: A Scientist Explores the Afterlife (Villard, 1995), 156-167.

We are part of the mystery we are trying to solve

An astrophysicist, a writer of science books for all ages, as well as a musician, David Darling is even more a part of All that is . . . and, he tells us with delight, so are we. Furthermore, he considers what we can learn from NDEs, which has been central to my quest and my thinking over the past several years. So, Darling’s reflections offer an eloquent and challenging conclusion to the thoughts that are shaping who “I am” at the ending of my life.

For Darling, the NDE “poses an enormous problem for the materialist” point of view, because it involves “an extraordinary deepening and broadening of consciousness as ordinary life comes to an end. Coupled with this increase in overall consciousness is a progressive lessening of self-awareness. As the experience unfolds, the subjects, it seems, become more and more conscious of everything except themselves.

“This is the core enigma of the NDE. Why should it be that as the brain dies, consciousness expands? And why should it be that as consciousness expands, self-consciousness disappears?

“Whatever may lie behind the NDE―whether it is evidence of life after death or a mere artifact of the dying brain―makes no difference in one important respect. The NDE is life-transforming. For a while, at least, other worlds appear on an equal footing with our own―as real as the familiar reality we thought unique. The body is seen to be of little consequence, and for some who go through the process all sense of being an individual is lost. Indeed, the NDE reveals something quite astonishing about the human condition. It affords a disturbing peek into the artificial nature of self and the world: neither can seem so substantial again.

“Take stars, for instance. They grow as they form. They ingest whatever falls onto their surface. They excrete stellar winds and flares. They even reproduce in the sense that the stuff of which they’re made is recycled into new stars. So, why isn’t a star alive? Perhaps it is. If we all agreed tomorrow that stars were alive they would be alive. ‘Life’ is our invention, so we can do with it as we please. We only have to make changes in our worldview by global consent for living stars to become part of our invented reality.

“What to us seem like certain facts are merely agreements between ourselves within a framework of interpretation. Change, impermanence and undividedness are the true qualities of the universe.

“On the face of it, a microbe’s ‘consciousness’ isn’t much. At best it seems to encompass a low sensitivity and inclination to react to what happens in the environment. But doesn’t an electron also ‘sense’ and ‘react’ when struck by another particle? Couldn’t we therefore say that an electron―one of the smallest particles in nature―was also vaguely conscious? And if so, doesn’t this imply that every single bit of the universe is somehow aware?

“A very different picture of reality begins to emerge, then, as we challenge some of the categorizations of orthodox science. In fact there is a deeper truth beyond science, beyond any form of rationalization, that has been known to the human race for a very long time. It is an intuitive, direct form of knowledge and not one that can or needs to be proved. As Max Planck said: ‘Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery in Nature. And it is because in the last analysis we ourselves are part of the mystery we are trying to solve.’”

David J. Darling, Soul Search: A Scientist Explores the Afterlife (Villard, 1995), 66-73.