Monday, March 14, 2022

After-Death Communication: Ruickbie excerpt #12

Psychologist Leo Ruickbie writes in “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies:

The range reported of apparently intentional contact between living and deceased, covering sound, smell and touch, as well as full-blown apparitions, has led to a new term “after-death communication.” The element of communication is key, but this can be interpreted as any sort of sign that is taken as communication, typically between the deceased and someone who was known to them in life, and is taken as a sign of continued existence after death.

High levels of ADCs have been reported in the research. Before publishing their 1995 book, Hello from Heaven, Bill and Judy Guggenheims had received 3,300 firsthand accounts of ADCs through their website. One meta-analysis of thirty-five studies published from 1894 to 2005 involved 50,682 participants from twenty-four countries, to give an estimate of 30–35% spontaneous incidence of ADCs in the general population, with 70-80% of the bereaved having an ADC within a year of bereavement, concluding that “ADCs are both common and normal.” A study published in 2020 estimated an incidence of 40–50% in the general population. Additionally, a therapeutic approach found that about 75% of people can have an induced ADC.

While many of these experiences are personally convincing, they do not always offer objective evidence of the survival of consciousness beyond death. The SPR’s Census produced eighty first-hand accounts of “death-coincidences” – recognized apparitions occurring within twelve hours of death, typically in such cases the witness is unaware that the person seen has died. The authors of the report concluded that apparitions of the deceased occurring at the time of death could not be due to chance alone, noting that this confirmed Gurney et al.’s earlier conclusion that “apparitions at death, &c., are a result of something beyond chance.”

Ken R. Vincent’s re-analysis of the Guggenheims’ published cases identified 65 out of 353 as “evidential cases” (18.4%). Vincent’s own analysis of 1,667 cases from the After-Death Communication Research Foundation database, identified 336 (20.1%) as evidential: 180 (10.8%) where the apparition was seen before the witness knew that person was dead; 99 (5.9%) in which apparitions conveyed information unknown to the witness that was later verified; and 57 (3.4%) involving multiple witnesses.

A study by Elsaesser et al., [Investigations] identified 20.9% of cases as involving a shared ADC, with the receipt of information previously unknown being a factor in 24.3% of cases. This study also found that 20.7% had had a “crisis ADC” within twenty-four hours of death (before or after), noting that “they are particularly significant, and even evidential, since experiencers claim that they have been informed of the death of a family member or friend by the deceased themselves.” Most of the ADCs in this study occurred to people during the day and whilst they were awake.

Evidentiality was relatively consistent, ranging from 18.4% to 24.3%. These were not laboratory experiments designed to give evidence of the afterlife, but personal experiences probably intended to provide reassurance to loved ones; nevertheless, it is striking how many of them are evidential and are so in a number of different ways. As Prof. Erlendur Haraldsson concluded after his own ADC survey [The Departed Among the Living], “When all the accounts we have collected are considered, it seems impossible to reject all of them as deceptions and mistaken perceptions. Something real is there.” 

 

Leo Ruickbie, “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies. Ruickbie teaches psychology at Kings College and the University of Northamptom in the United Kingdom. Footnotes have been deleted from these online excerpts from his essay. The entire essay may be downloaded at the Bigelow site https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.

 



Saturday, March 12, 2022

Mere chance cannot explain: Ruickbie excerpt #11

Psychologist Leo Ruickbie writes in “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies:

Æta Highett had lost her fiancé, Eldred Wolferstan Bowyer-Bower, killed in action on the Western Front in March 1917. In December 1917 she had this experience:

I heard a number of raps when I was in bed and I began to talk to Eldred and asked him to rap twice if he was ever going to show himself to me. Almost immediately two raps came; I waited a long time but saw nothing. Then I went to sleep. Afterwards I woke up and looked round and saw Eldred on the bed beside me, he was wearing his blue suit. I sat up and started talking to him, [Miss Highett records what she said, and that “his lips started to move” and made a reply “just above a whisper”]. I then tried to touch him, but my hand went through him, and like a fool I started to cry, and he disappeared.

This single case contains almost everything we need by way of evidence for the afterlife: two apparitions at the approximate time of death before the fact is known, or even guessed at; two apparitions after death has been established; a premonition; and two evidential mediumistic communications. Each experience on its own is vulnerable to being casually dismissed – coincidence, indigestion, etc.but together, experienced by people separated by continents, but all bearing on the same person, they are nigh unassailable. What reason could anyone have to doubt any of the principal witnesses?

The Bowyer-Bowers were an upper-class family in England at a time when honour and reputation were still important, with a tradition of military service: Eldred, his brother, father and grandfather were, or had been, soldiers. Both Dorothy and Cecily had already decided not to mention what had happened to them: the full details only came to light after Æta talked about her visit to Mrs. Brittain, otherwise they would have remained silent. Æta herself was reticent in mentioning her own apparitional experience. Both Dorothy and Margaret initially sought non-paranormal explanations. There was no attempt to gain publicity or any secondary gain out of their experiences.

It was only the work of Hubert Wales (1870–1943) in gathering the letters and statements together that brought the case to wider notice in the Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, which was only circulated among members and not on general sale, so the publication of the case was anything but sensationalistic. In the report, Wales is described as having been a member of the SPR “for several years.” His interest seems only to have been to gather and make available to the SPR the facts of the case: he was not credited as the author of the report.

This type of phenomenon has come to be called a “crisis apparition” after the work of the early SPR researchers. In the introduction to the SPR’s monumental two-volume work on the subject of Phantasms of the Living by Edmund Gurney, Frederic Myers and Frank Podmore, Myers wrote:

Testimony proves that phantasms (impressions, voices, or figures) of persons undergoing some crisis—especially death—are perceived by their friends and relatives with a frequency which mere chance cannot explain.

The testimony referred to involved “over two thousand depositions” of which more than half described crisis-type apparitions. According to a study by Hornell Hart, almost everyone who experiences this class of phenomenonapparitions of people who were dead or close to death at the time of the appearancerecognizes them (85%). Sometimes the apparition was seen more than once (26%), or by two or more people at the same time. Other than signaling their own death, some cases also revealed additional information that was also later found to be true (8%). The crisis apparition occurs close to the time of crisis, but, as in the Bowyer-Bower case, related experiences can occur quite some time after it, and, as we shall see, involve a number of different elements. 

 

Leo Ruickbie, “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies. Ruickbie teaches psychology at Kings College and the University of Northamptom in the United Kingdom. Footnotes have been deleted from these online excerpts from his essay. The entire essay may be downloaded at the Bigelow site https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.

Crisis Apparitions: Ruickbie excerpt #10

Psychologist Leo Ruickbie writes in “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies: 

“I had this weird dream last night,” said my wife on the morning of April 27, 2017. “You were talking to me, saying that someone had died, three times. I couldn’t make out the name.” She had woken up, convinced that I was trying to tell her something, only to find me fast asleep. She checked the clock – 05:00 – and went back to sleep. She thought that the dream might have been caused by her worrying about an elderly colleague and friend who had recently had a heart attack. Later that morning, the telephone rang. It was my father. He was in tears. My mother had died. Although she had been suffering from a long and debilitating illness, we had been planning to visit my parents in two weeks and had every expectation of seeing her again. My wife had never had a dream like this before and we were not especially anxious about her condition at the time. We later found out that my mother must have died at around 05:00 that morning.


Whereas we had received a message in a dream, other experiences can involve actual apparitions. The famous medium Gladys Osborne Leonard (1882–1968) had a powerful experience just as she was beginning to explore her interest in Spiritualism in her early twenties. Her mother’s health had deteriorated, but Leonard did not think it was serious. She was away from home on the night of December 18, 1906, when she awoke “with a feeling that something unusual was happening.”

Leonard had an unmistakable vision of her mother, looking younger and healthier, with radiant eyes and a happy smile. When the vision faded, Leonard looked at the clock: just after 2 a.m. She went back to sleep. She slept late and awoke to find a telegram from her brother: “Mother passed away two o'clock this morning.”

Born in 1882, the same year as the Society for Psychical Research was founded, Leonard’s fate would be interwoven with that of the SPR, becoming the subject of indepth research into her mediumship. She helped Sir Oliver Lodge apparently communicate with his son Raymond, killed in the First World War, and was retained by the SPR in 1918 for three months of extensive testing involving 73 sittings, of which 70 involved anonymous sitters. In her report, the largely skeptical Helen Salter conceded that the sitters were satisfied that the medium was wholly trustworthy and had provided evidence that the human personality survived death. She also convinced the even more skeptical Eleanor Sidgwick, wife of the SPR’s first president Henry Sidgwick.  

On September 29, 1917, a young lady sat with the professional medium Mrs. Annie Brittain. Æta Highett had lost her fiancé, Eldred Wolferstan Bowyer-Bower, killed in action on the Western Front, and like many in her situation sought solace in Spiritualism. She had not been to see Mrs. Brittain before, but the medium was able to tell her many things about her fiancé, including the following:

She said, “He has a sister.” I said, “yes, Cicely.” She said, “No, that’s not the name.” She waited a few seconds and then said: “Joan. She has a little girl called Joan, now I get Dorothy.” I said, “yes.” He says, “Tell Dorothy she has the power to communicate.” He also said, “She is not in this country.”

It was all true, but that was not the end of it. Bowyer-Bower’s half-sister, Dorothy Spearman, lived in India at the time, and when she heard about Mrs. Brittain’s message she wrote back with a strange story to tell:

On March 19 [1917], in the late part of the morning, I was sewing and talking to baby, Joan was in the sitting-room and did not see anything. I had a great feeling I must turn round and did, to see Eldred; he looked so happy and that dear mischievous look. I was so glad to see him and told him I would just put baby in a safer place, then we could talk. “Fancy coming out here,” I said, turning round again, and was just putting my hands out to give him a hug and a kiss, but Eldred had gone. I called and looked for him. I never saw him again. At first [I] thought it was simply my brain. Then I did think for a second something must have happened to him and a terrible fear came over me.

That same morning in Bournemouth, Bowyer-Bower’s sister Cecily Chater was still in bed, when her two-year-old daughter Betty came into the room, saying that “Uncle Alley Boy is downstairs” (Alley Boy was his pet-name since childhood). Cecily explained that he was in France, but the girl was insistent.

In the afternoon later that day, Mrs. Watson, an elderly friend of Mrs. Bowyer-Bower wrote to her about Eldred, saying “about tea time, a certain and awful feeling came over her that he was killed.” Mrs. Bowyer-Bower wrote back that he was “fit and happy.”

At dawn on March 19, 1917, Captain Bowyer-Bower, 59 Squadron, Royal Flying Corps, took out a lumbering RE8 two-seater biplane on a reconnaissance mission over German lines, with 2nd Lt Eric Elgey as observer. A second RE8 flew as an escort. About an hour into their flight, German fighter planes of Jagdstaffel 2 found them, and began firing at Bowyer-Bower’s aircraft, shooting it down near Croisilles, Pas-de-Calais, behind enemy lines.

Cecily received a telegram from the War Office on March 23, with the news that he was missing in action. About two weeks later, Dorothy read the news in the Indian newspapers. At this point he was still listed missing.

His father, a captain with the Corps of Royal Engineers, was also fighting on the Western Front. On May 10, 1917, as the British advanced during the German withdrawal to the Hindenburg Line, he came across a makeshift cross made from aeroplane wreckage on which someone had written “Two unknown captains of the Royal Flying Corps.” It was the grave of his son and Elgey – Eldred Bowyer-Bower was only now confirmed killed in action.

In late November or early December, 1917, Eldred’s mother, Margaret Bowyer-Bower, was woken in the night, first feeling too hot, then “extraordinarily cold with a most unnatural coldness.” As she tried to return to sleep, “a yellow-blue ray came right across the room.” She thought that the maid had not drawn the air-raid curtains properly, but as it continued to move, “I watched, not at all nervously, and something like a crumpled filmy piece of chiffon unfolded and the beautiful wavy top of Eldred’s head appeared.” The apparition continued to develop, apparently in full and realistic colour, as she noted “his lovely blue eyes.” He turned and looked at her. The development of the form stopped at the chin and “quivered and shook so much.” Worried that it would disappear, Mrs. Bowyer-Bower reached out her hands, saying “Eldred, I see you.” At once, “it all flickered quite out, light and all.” She considered that it “might have been a dream,” but “in my own mind I am satisfied it was not.” She also mentioned that “Eldred referred to it through Mrs. Leonard in Jan. 1918.”

 

Leo Ruickbie, “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies. Ruickbie teaches psychology at Kings College and the University of Northamptom in the United Kingdom. Footnotes have been deleted from these online excerpts from his essay. The entire essay may be downloaded at the Bigelow site https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.

 


Friday, March 11, 2022

Evidence for reincarnation: Ruickbie excerpt #9

Psychologist Leo Ruickbie writes in “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies:

Scientific research into the phenomenon was pioneered by Dr. Ian Stevenson, beginning in 1960. He wrote some 300 papers and fourteen books on reincarnation, collecting and investigating some 3,000 cases over forty years.As well as confirming memories of past lives by matching them with facts known about those past lives, he also found evidence of birth marks and defects in supposedly reincarnated people matching injuries received in the previous life (35%).Despite being skeptical in 1972, as noted above, he later said that “I think a rational person, if he wants, can believe in reincarnation on the basis of evidence.”

The two most compelling cases are those of James Leininger and Ryan Hammons. James Leininger (1998– ) started remembering his life as a WWII fighter pilot between ages two and five, firstly by demonstrating an unusual interest in aircraft and level of knowledge beyond his age, and later by mentioning names from his former life that were confirmed. He had been called James, flown a Corsair from a ship called Natoma, had had a friend called Jack Larsen, and was shot down near Iwo Jima – all these details and more were later confirmed. When Ryan Hammons (2005– ) was four, he started remembering details of a life that were finally matched with actor and Hollywood agent Marty Martin (born Morris Kolinsky, 1903–1964). Ryan’s mother contacted researcher Dr. Jim Tucker, who confirmed fifty-five statements concerning Ryan’s former life as Martin, including correcting a mistake on Martin’s death certificate.

As well as statements from people claiming to be reincarnated, there is confirmation from other areas of research. After an NDE about 70% report a belief in reincarnation, against 23% of the general population. It is also more than just belief, people also report NDEs directly relating to reincarnation. In some accounts, people described being told about reincarnation or seeing others waiting to be reincarnated. One NDEr reported a life review that extended into past lives:

My whole life went before me of things I have done and haven’t done, but not just of this one lifetime, but of all the lifetimes. I know for a fact there is reincarnation. This is an absolute. I was shown all those lives and how I had overcome some of the things I had done in other lives.

Even taking into account all of the criticisms of Stevenson’s work, his research and that of others, is overwhelmingly convincing. The implications are clear: reincarnation must mean that consciousness persists after physical death. Having died, a person's consciousness should be a thing of the past. What, then, does that mean about the past? 

 

Leo Ruickbie, “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies. Ruickbie teaches psychology at Kings College and the University of Northamptom in the United Kingdom. Footnotes have been deleted from these online excerpts from his essay. The entire essay may be downloaded at the Bigelow site, https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php

 

Thursday, March 10, 2022

Dr. Long's NDE surveys: Ruickbie excerpt #8

Psychologist Leo Ruickbie writes in “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies: 

For his 2011 book Evidence of the Afterlife, radiation oncologist Jeffrey Long worked with a sub-set of 613 cases submitted between 2004 and 2008 – the “NDERF survey.” He found twelve common points of agreement in near-death experiences, although other studies have used more extensive scales – Bruce Greyson’s “near-death experience scale” is sixteen items long. Four of Long’s questions related to aspects of direct interest in this present study, concerning the location of consciousness, and the experience of space and time.

Long’s survey found that three-fifths (60.5%) said that they had had a sense of altered space and time, with a third (33.9%) saying specifically of time that “everything seemed to be happening at once.” About one in five people (22.2%) also said that they had experienced a review of past events in their lives. Long concluded that: “The NDERF study makes it clear that the events seen in the NDEr’s life review are real” and “further strong evidence for the reality of near-death experiences.”

In most cases, the NDE will involve some change in the perception of time, showing that our normal perception of time is not the only one. The life review challenges normal time to an even greater extent because the experience is not like ordinary memory recall, where you remain in your own viewpoint, but a transcendent view of the totality of past events, often with sound, emotion and even actual thoughts, from an external perspective. 

 

Leo Ruickbie, “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies. Ruickbie teaches psychology at Kings College and the University of Northamptom in the United Kingdom. Footnotes have been deleted from these online excerpts from his essay. The entire essay may be downloaded at the Bigelow site, https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php


Wednesday, March 9, 2022

NDE life reviews: Ruickbie excerpt #7

Psychologist Leo Ruickbie writes in “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies: 

Albert Heim
In 1871, the Swiss geologist Albert Heim (1849–1937) was mountain climbing in the Appenzell Alps in northeastern Switzerland. Leading a party down a steep snowfield on 2,502 m (8,209 ft) high Mt Säntis, he lost his footing and went over a cliff. As he tumbled more than 60 ft in free fall, a curious thing happened, time slowed down: “What I felt in five to ten seconds could not be described in ten times that length of time.” He had time to plan what to do before he hit the ground – keep hold of his Alpenstock or let go, take off his glasses, or keep them on? – worry about missing his inaugural university lecture in five days time, and wonder how his loved ones would take the news of his death.

His train of thought was suddenly interrupted: “I saw my whole past life take place in many images, as though on a stage at some distance from me. I saw myself as the chief character in the performance.” When he hit the snowfield below, he lay unmoving. His companions must have thought him dead, but he recovered consciousness and was fit enough to give his lecture. Despite pursuing a glowing career in geology, Heim never forgot his experience on Säntis and collected thirty similar accounts told to him in person by fellow mountaineers (including the British physicist John Tyndall), soldiers, construction workers and others who had had what today we would call near-death experiences. His was the first systematic study of such experiences and he discovered that many others had felt that “time became greatly expanded,” often with “a sudden review of the individual’s entire past.”

Since then reports of what has become known as “life review” have increased dramatically. In 1998, Dr. Jeffrey Long established the Near-Death Experience Research Foundation (NDERF) to collect firsthand accounts of people’s near-death experiences using an online questionnaire. In the first ten years of running this project he received over 1,300 reports of NDEs. As of 14 June 2021, NDERF has now received 4,929 reports from people all over the world.

The first case he documented was that of Dr. George Rodonaia, with an MD and PhDs in neuropathology and the psychology of religion, Rodonaia was just about the best qualified person to have a near-death experience and had one of the most astonishing near-death experiences on record. Before emigrating to the USA in 1989, Rodonaia was a research psychiatrist at the University of Moscow in what was then the Soviet Union. In 1976, he was hit by a car and pronounced dead at the scene. Near-death researcher Phyllis Atwater, who got to know Rodonaia well, said he had been assassinated by the KGB. Being dead he was taken to a morgue and remained there for three days, only showing signs of life when a doctor started to perform an autopsy. As a scalpel cut into his abdomen, he felt his consciousness being forced back into his body. Among other things, he described this experience:

I underwent what has been called the ‘life-review process,’ for I saw my life from beginning to end all at once. I participated in the real life dramas of my life, almost like a holographic image of my life going on before me – no sense of past, present or future, just now and the reality of my life. It wasn’t as though it started with birth and ran along to my life at the University of Moscow. It all appeared at once. There I was. This was my life.

Atwater could understand what he was talking about, she had experienced three NDEs following a miscarriage. During the second episode she experienced a profound life review:

I remembered hearing stories of past life reviews, a particular feature of dying common to all, where your life passes before you at great speed for final review. Remembering this, I expected some kind of theatrical showing of my life as Phyllis or perhaps something like a television replay, but such was not the case. Mine was not a review, it was a reliving. For me, it was a total reliving of every thought I had ever thought, every word I had ever spoken, and every deed I had ever done; plus the effect of each thought, word, and deed on everyone and anyone who had ever come within my environment or sphere of influence whether I knew them or not (including unknown passers-by on the street); plus the effect of each thought, word, and deed on weather, plants, animals, soil, trees, water, and air. It was a reliving of the total gestalt of me as Phyllis, complete with all the consequences of ever having lived at all. No detail was left out.

What is evidentially important here is that her experience did not match her expectations; she could not be said to have had a life review because she expected to have one. And then there’s the quality of her life review itself. What is also remarkable is that life review often involves, as in Atwater’s case, a total and immersive re-enactment at a transcendent level. It is not a simple replay of the past, which would situate the person’s consciousness within their past self, but an experience with depth, an actual reality, often extended beyond what would have been the person’s perspective in life, whilst maintaining an ordinarily impossible exterior conscious awareness.


Leo Ruickbie, “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies. Ruickbie teaches psychology at Kings College and the University of Northamptom in the United Kingdom. Footnotes have been deleted from these online excerpts from his essay. The entire essay may be downloaded at the Bigelow site, https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.

 

Tuesday, March 8, 2022

Ghosts are not illusions: Ruickbie excerpt #6

Psychologist Leo Ruickbie writes in “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies:

A common argument against the objective or independent quality of apparitions is that they are the product of the mind of the person seeing them, an illusion, in fact. This is plausible. We know that people see hallucinations under a range of conditions, such as sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation, drug intoxication, extreme stress, and mental derangement. So what should be different about ghosts? It is important to note that Martindale [see Ruickie excerpts 3 and 4] was not under the influence of any of these factors, but how else could we test this?

People have tried to record ghosts using photography, film (video) and audio, with occasionally surprising results; however, almost all of these can be explained as artifacts or manipulations of the media, even if they may not be. We had best leave that Pandora’s Box alone.

We have seen that apparitions can reveal information to the witness that they did not already have and often did not know they needed. This seems like cast-iron proof that apparitions cannot be in the mind of the witness; however, we could still argue that this was the percipient’s psi (the general term for telepathy, precognition, etc.) working unconsciously to manifest what the conscious mind required. It seems a bit strained, but even so, we could argue that.

What if a ghost were seen by more than one person? Would that test the percipient psi theory? There are two classes of possibility here: the same ghost seen by different witnesses at different times; and the same ghost seen by different witnesses at the same time. There are plentiful examples for both situations.

The Martindale case has already supplied an example of the former, but, of course, there are many more. A young medical student, Rosina Clara Despard (1863–1930), conducted a detailed investigation of the haunting of her family home in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire. A ghost was seen or heard over a number of years from 1882 to 1889 by at least eighteen people (independently, sometimes consecutively, and on four occasions at the same time), and by the family dogs (judging from their reactions). Frederic Myers was also involved, interviewing witnesses, and encouraging Rosina to investigate further. Andrew Mackenzie, another figure connected with the SPR [Society for Psychical Research], collected reports of continued paranormal phenomena up until the 1970s.

In the Census of Hallucinations there were 283 cases where the percipient was not alone (and the other person was awake). The other person also saw the apparition in 95 cases (33.6%). There were also another auditory cases experienced by more than one person at the same time. Hart et al., used stricter criteria to identify 46 cases “in which more than one person was in a position to be a percipient” and of these found that 26 (56%) were “collective.” Stevenson looked at other research to conclude that approximately 30% of visual hallucinations were seen by more than one witness.

Gurney still tried to explain collective apparitions as the psi effect of a principle percipient telepathically causing everyone else to see the same thing, what he called “psychical affection,” and Stevenson “telepathic infection.” Stevenson pointed out that this leaves the perplexing question of why the group should suddenly become telepathic on the occasion of the ghost’s appearance, and on no other; Tyrell also argued that the witnesses all saw the same apparition, but differently because it was from their individual viewpoints, thus not like an image received from one mind. 

Although immaterial, we can rule out that apparitions seen by mentally normal people not under the influence of drugs are illusions because they can be seen by several people at different times and at the same time: they demonstrate a realness that would be widely accepted if it did not contradict our dominant ideas about the nature of reality.

 

Leo Ruickbie, “The Ghost in the Time Machine,” his 2021 prize winning essay in a competition sponsored by the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies. Ruickbie teaches psychology at Kings College and the University of Northamptom in the United Kingdom. Footnotes have been deleted from these online excerpts from his essay. The entire essay may be downloaded at the Bigelow site, https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.


Gödel's reasons for an afterlife

Alexander T. Englert, “We'll meet again,” Aeon , Jan 2, 2024, https://aeon.co/essays/kurt-godel-his-mother-and-the-a...