What might a soul look like? Rousseau excerpt #3

David Rousseau & Julie Billingham in their Bigelow Institute 2021 prize-winning essay, “On evidence for the Possibility of Consciousness Survival,” address several critical questions. They rely primarily on near-death experience research to formulate their answers.

 

Mental states have complex properties and change in complex ways. Naturalistic things exhibit complex attributes and behaviors by means of a complex structure, which also entails having a size and shape. Might souls have such attributes?

In the previous section, we suggested that the soul is a hyperspatial thing with a complex structure, but this is only a hint at what the soul looks like. We also need to decide whether it really is a complex thing or just does things that would require it to be complex if it were a naturalistic thing. What we ideally desire is evidence of what it looks like when looked at by a competent observer.

If the soul has a hyperspatial shape it might be very hard for people to interpret what they see in a way unconditioned by expectation effects. Our minds naturally make sense of what we see by referring to our experiences and focusing on aspects of interest to us. We see such cognitive disconnects very clearly in NDE cases where people encounter a ‘being of light’ and experience it in terms of a familiar mental model such as Jesus, Krishna or Buddha. This is quite common, but some people have sufficient conceptual versatility to mitigate or overcome such effects to some degree. Given the size of the NDE database, we might reasonably hope to obtain some revealing reports, and indeed we do.

In Greyson and Stevenson’s retrospective study of 78 cases*, 58% of the NDE experiencers reported having some kind of ‘body’ during their NDE. According to Raymond Moody in The Light Beyond:

“Most people say they are not just some spot of consciousness when this [the OBE] happens. They still seem to be in some kind of body even though they are out of their physical bodies. They say the spiritual body has shape and form unlike our physical bodies. It has arms and a shape although most are at a loss to describe what it looks like. Some people describe it as a cloud of colors, or an energy field. One NDEer I spoke to several years ago said he studied his hands while he was in this state and saw them to be composed of light with tiny structures in them. He could see the delicate whorls of his fingerprints and tubes of light up his arms”.

Here are some direct reports:

“My being had no physical characteristics, but I have to describe it with physical terms. I could describe it in so many ways, in so many words, but none of them would be exactly right. It's so hard to describe”.

“[When I came out of the physical body] it was like I did come out of my body and go into something else. I didn't think I was just nothing. It was another body ... but not another regular human body. It's a little bit different. It was not exactly like a human body, but it wasn't any big glob of matter, either. It had form to it, but no colors. And I know I still had something you could call hands. I can't describe it. I was more fascinated with everything around me – seeing my own body there, and all – so I didn't think about the type of body I was in”.

“I was still in a body – not a physical body, but something I can best describe as an energy pattern. If I had to put it into words, I would say that it was transparent, a spiritual as opposed to a material being. Yet, it definitely had different parts”.

These reports suggest that a soul is a complex system, having a full complement of spatial properties including size, shape and structure in addition to location. If the soul is a hyperspatial structure it is hardly surprising that people are so often at a loss to describe what they saw, or that different people interpret the experience in different ways. Given their lack of an experiential reference or relevant vocabulary it is impossible for us at present to reconstruct from their reports exactly what they saw, but the evidence is sufficiently clear to support a conclusion that souls are complex systems. This resolves the question about the soul’s spatial properties in a way that is naturalistic. It opens up possibilities for understanding how the soul can have different causal powers at different times and changing ‘mental states’, and undergo changes in mental aspects while remaining the same individual. All of this is consistent with naturalistic requirements.

* B. Greyson and I. Stevenson, ‘The phenomenology of near-death experiences.’, American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 137, pp. 1193–1196, 1980. 

 

David Rousseau & Julie Billingham, “On evidence for the Possibility of Consciousness survival.” Footnotes have been deleted for these excerpts, but a full paper is available at https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php. David Rousseau is a British systems philosopher, Director of the Centre for Systems Philosophy, chair of the Board of Trustees of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, a Past President of the ISSS, and the Company Secretary of the British Association for the Study of Spirituality. Julie Billingham is Strategy Director for the Centre for Systems Philosophy.

Where might a soul be? Rousseau excerpt #2

Julie Billingham

David Rousseau & Julie Billingham in their Bigelow Institute 2021 prize-winning essay, “On evidence for the Possibility of Consciousness Survival,” address several critical questions. They rely primarily on near-death experience research to formulate their answers.

If souls are distinct from bodies, then to be naturalistic they must be located in space somewhere. However, science has not been able to detect any non-physical things or substances. How do we reconcile this with the claim that kinds of psychonic stuff and things actually exist? This is especially puzzling now we have proposed that souls have physical properties in addition to psychonic ones. Where might the soul be, and why has science not been able to detect its presence?

It is natural for people to think that they are ‘in’ their bodies, viewing the world from ‘behind their eyes’. We think this because that is where our sensory locus is, but the location of the body provides no evidence for the location of the soul. It is logically possible that the body is a sophisticated but nevertheless remotely controlled organic robot interlinked via a secure means of communication with a ‘controller’ (the soul) that is located elsewhere.

This theoretical speculation suggests that we might be able to investigate where the soul is by looking at NDE cases involving out-of-body experiences (OBEs), where the soul is observing the physical world without using the physical senses. We might be able to infer a useful hypothesis from the perspectival location of the soul’s perceptions and/or from the qualities of that perception.

We are fortunate to have many NDE OBE cases with features that are revealing in just the right way. Many NDE experiencers report remarkable perception while in the OBE state. Here are some typical examples:

“I was hovering over a stretcher in one of the emergency rooms at the hospital. I glanced down at the stretcher, knew the body wrapped in blankets was mine, and really didn't care. The room was much more interesting than my body. And what a neat perspective. I could see everything. And I do mean everything! I could see the top of the light on the ceiling, and the underside of the stretcher. I could see the tiles on the ceiling and the tiles on the floor, simultaneously. Three hundred sixty-degree spherical vision. And not just spherical. Detailed! I could see every single hair and the follicle out of which it grew on the head of the nurse standing beside the stretcher. At the time I knew exactly how many hairs there were to look at. But I shifted focus. She was wearing glittery white nylons. Every single shimmer and sheen stood out in glowing detail, and once again I knew exactly how many sparkles there were”.

“I could see behind me, from several sides simultaneously, and through objects. I was able to see what was going on in the room and in the corridor, behind the wall... My sight was very particular6. I don't know how to describe it: I saw everything with a total sight: the lake, the mountain, people along the banks of Evian, the texture of their clothes. I could see in the boats, in the houses, little animals in their burrows, the roots, the blades of grass, I saw all that simultaneously and if I focused on something I could see it through any obstacle and with every minute detail, from its surface to the organization of its atoms. Really a detailed and overall vision”.

“It’s very difficult to explain, but I was able to see the bed and my body simultaneously from all directions. I could see the top of my head and at the same time I saw my left and right sides, and the bed from below and from above, and all the room like that, I was everywhere at the same time, you see? ... I was surprised that I could see at an angle of 360°, I could see in front and behind, I could see underneath, from far, I could see up close and also transparently. I remember seeing a stick of lipstick in one of the nurses’ pockets. If I wanted to see inside the lamp which illuminated the room, I would manage to, and all of this instantly, as soon as I wanted to. I could say how people were dressed, I could see the sandstone wall, and also the stone slabs of the floor. I was able to verify their presence in a photograph later on since I thought it strange and anachronistic to have such slabs in an operating room. It was surprising and I could see, all at once, a green plaque with white letters saying, ‘Manufacture de Saint Etienne’. The plaque was under the edge of the operating table, covered up by the sheet I was lying on. I could see with multiple axes of vision, from many places at once. This is the reason why I saw this plaque under the operating table, from a completely different angle, since I was up there by the ceiling and I still managed to see this plaque located under the table, itself covered by a sheet. When I wanted to check this, we7 realized the plaque really was there and read ‘Manufacture d’armes de Saint Etienne’“.

“I visited various places I managed to identify afterwards. I remember a window in a village, a building with very white plaster, sand-carved windows. My curiosity was attracted to details. This is quite important, since we cannot do this normally, like seeing inside and outside at the same time, an impression of a quasi-holographic vision... Not a panoramic view, but seeing in front, behind, all details simultaneously which is completely different from ordinary sight. It is very rich”.

“I saw all around me, I saw the inside of my body”.

The perceptual phenomena described in such reports include being able to see simultaneously in all directions away from the vantage point and being able to see things from all angles simultaneously as though that vantage point is omnipresent, cosmologists, and philosophers. It is important to note that this view is backed up by detailed and rigorous theoretical work in physics and mathematics and is not just a speculation on the part of these researchers. This distinguishes the present situation from earlier eras in which researchers claimed that hyperspatial geometries could account for psychical phenomena without any credible theories grounded in physics to lend support to their views.

To return to the original question, from this evidence we can conclude that the soul does have a spatial location, which in principle resolves the puzzle of how the unique pairing between soul and body is possible. However, the NDE reports imply a number of interesting other points.

Not only does the vantage point seem to be in a hyperspatial location but also experiencers are able to see with a sensory apparatus that exploits hyperspatial geometries. Seeing the ordinary three-dimensional (3D) world requires a 3D lens focusing an image of a portion of the world onto a 2D retina. By (inadequate) extrapolation, seeing in an omni-perspectival way would require a ‘retina’ that is at least 3D on which an ‘image’ is focused by a ‘lens’ that is at least 4D. Omni-perspectival vision requires not only an ‘eye’ located in hyperspace, but also an ‘eye’ that is itself a hyperspatial structure. By implication the soul is a hyperspatial structure too, since an ordinary-spatial structure cannot incorporate a hyperspatial structure.

This is an important conclusion. A thing cannot fit into a space that has a lower dimensionality than the thing itself, so by implication the soul cannot ever be ‘in’ the body. This suggests that the soul is normally ‘elsewhere’ from the body; when the OBE commences, perception switches from seeing via the body to direct observation by the soul, without it having moved at all. The sense of being somewhere in the physical world during the OBE, or moving around in it, is therefore seen to be a data-processing artefact, an ‘interpretation’ that the mind places on the perceptual data based on psychological interests and expectancy effects.

If the soul is in hyperspace, then this may be part of the reason why science has not detected souls directly. Ordinary physical instruments may just not be able to look in the right direction.

The theoretical possibility that the ordinary world is a 3D membrane in a hyperspatial bulk is helpful, but it would be even more compelling if we had independent evidence that information and influence can flow between these domains. Might wholly physical phenomena exploit such mechanisms, if they exist? A potential candidate is the mysterious “quasi-crystals”, physical crystals discovered in 1982 by Daniel Shechtman, for which he was awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. These structures are aperiodic in three dimensions, meaning that their ‘stacking pattern’ never repeats. It can be shown mathematically that there is no algorithm for deciding how to complete such a stacking pattern by manipulating three-dimensional components. This makes the existence of such crystals in the real world a puzzle: how could the components stack themselves so as to grow a homogenous crystal? However, the crystals can be mathematically modelled as three-dimensional cross-sections through periodic five-dimensional structures. The implication is that although these crystals are impossible to construct via naturalistic processes restricted to the 3-membrane, their existence would be unproblematic if hyperspatial processes are involved.

The hypothesis that the soul is in a proximate hyperspace that is causally connected to our ordinary physical space is therefore plausible in the light of both NDE evidence and recent discoveries in physics.

David Rousseau & Julie Billingham, “On evidence for the Possibility of Consciousness survival.” Footnotes have been deleted for these excerpts, but a full paper is available at https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php. David Rousseau is a British systems philosopher, Director of the Centre for Systems Philosophy, chair of the Board of Trustees of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, a Past President of the ISSS, and the Company Secretary of the British Association for the Study of Spirituality. Julie Billingham is Strategy Director for the Centre for Systems Philosophy.

Soul-body interaction? Rousseau excerpt #1

David Rousseau & Julie Billingham in their Bigelow Institute 2021 prize-winning essay, “On evidence for the Possibility of Consciousness Survival,” address several critical questions. They rely primarily on near-death experience research to formulate their answers.

To preserve naturalism, we have to assume that souls are psycho-physical things and interact with bodies via shared physical properties. This is interesting because it implies that soul-body interaction is mediated by physical fields rather than some other more exotic phenomenon.

The challenge now is to find evidence to indicate that in practice physical forces are involved in this and to give clues about the nature of the force(s) involved. There is suggestive evidence in some NDE cases.

To understand this point, we must think about a living person as a complex system. A system is a structure that functions as a whole in virtue of the causal relationships between its parts [90].

The body is of course a complex system in its own right, but we will focus on the person being a system comprised of a soul and a physical body. When a complex system works well it is sometimes difficult to tell how it works due to the many interdependencies between its parts. Properties can emerge that do not belong to the parts individually but only to the system as a whole.

A feature of complex systems is that if you take them apart, the emergent properties disappear, e.g. the parts of an aircraft cannot fly. To restore the original functionality the parts have to be carefully reassembled so that everything goes together correctly and we end up with a properly and fully integrated system. If in this process parts are lost, damaged or misaligned, the system level properties will be proportionately compromised. The more complex the system, the higher the risk of something going wrong during reintegration.

Given this model, we can now conceptualise the NDE as an event in which soul-body integration is disrupted and then restored when the person recovers. With very rare exceptions, the onset of an NDE is accompanied by a very rapid loss of all control over the body and sensation of bodily states. These are rapidly regained when the NDE ends. NDE experiencers notice this primarily because while they are in the OBE portion of their NDE, they lose the sensation of pain and also find themselves unable to communicate physically with people around their body. The following cases are typical:

“...there was the most searing pain in my arm... Then I was aware that I was losing consciousness and of people rushing around me, knocking things over in the rush to get emergency equipment set up. Then there was nothing – no pain at all. And I was up there on a level with the ceiling...I could see...my body, down there on the bed... the light... I...was being drawn into it...I had the most wonderful feeling of peace... And then suddenly, I was pulled back, away from it, back, slammed into my body again, and back with the pain, and I didn’t want to go” ([64], our emphasis).

“I began bleeding badly after the birth of my daughter and I was instantly surrounded by medical staff who started working on me. I was in great pain. Then suddenly the pain was gone and I was looking down on them working on me. I heard one doctor say he couldn’t find a pulse. Next I was travelling down a tunnel toward a bright light. But I never reached the end of the tunnel. A gentle voice told me I had to go back... I hit the hospital bed with an electrifying jerk and the pain was back. I was being rushed into an operating theatre for surgery to stop the bleeding” ([91], our emphasis).

The very sudden transition from a state of intense pain to complete painlessness at the onset of the NDE, and the immediate return of pain when the NDE ends, is remarkable. Natural endorphins can suppress pain and engender feelings of well-being, but their effects last for hours whereas NDEs last only seconds or minutes [77], so it is unlikely that these effects are due to exclusively bodily mechanisms. This point is reinforced by the cases in which a person can see their body receiving electric shocks, their chest being pounded, their face stroked, and so on, while they themselves feel no relevant bodily sensations [28], e.g. [64], [92]. Greyson reported an interesting case in which the patient could see their body reacting to hallucinogenic drugs while they themselves were mentally lucid [93].

If this model of NDEs as disruptions of soul-body integration is correct, and if the way the connection is made is naturalistic, then we can foresee the possibility that reintegration can sometimes go wrong. This gives us an opportunity to learn about how the system normally works. For complex natural systems, studying failure modes is in general a useful route to understanding them better. For example in medical research, correlating injured or diseased brain parts with functional deficits is an important way of working out which parts of the brain are involved in which cognitive or motor functions.

We can regard a healthy person in ordinary life as closely integrated so that influences can be smoothly exchanged between their mind and their body. If this integration is compromised, then a number of interesting consequences might be expected. Some influences from the mind might no longer reach the relevant parts of the body (e.g. the brain), and so some physical control might be lost, manifesting for example as kinds of paralysis, tremors or coordination problems. Likewise we might expect that information about some states of the body is no longer properly conveyed to the mind, manifesting for example as inattentions to parts of the body or compromises of some kinds of sensory awareness. Medically, such signs are known as ‘neurological deficits’ and assumed to be caused by damage to the brain or nervous system.

Other effects are possible too: influences directed from the soul towards the body might ‘miss their target’ and cause unintended physical changes beyond the body, while attempts by the soul to restore ‘missing’ information about the body might result in the soul mistakenly processing information from bodies other than its own. These latter two problems would manifest as psi phenomena.

Therefore we might anticipate that some people might, after an NDE, exhibit what look like neurological deficits and acquire psychic abilities. Intriguingly, many people who have had NDEs experience exhibit both neurological deficits and new or enhanced psi abilities.

There is substantial evidence in the professional NDE literature for experiencers afterwards having both enhanced functional psychic abilities of the informational type (e.g. spontaneous telepathic impressions) and dysfunctional PK abilities (e.g. unintentional disruptions of nearby electronic equipment).

The neurological deficits are difficult to judge because people may have acquired them due to brain or nervous systems damage caused by the physiological trauma of their NDE incident, for example oxygen starvation. However, there is much general medical evidence for people exhibiting neurological deficits without having any relevant nervous system damage. Medically, these are known as ‘conversion disorders’ and attributed to psychological causes. Such cases are well known in medical practice, where the prevalence of unexplained neurological symptoms typically ranges between 30 and 50% of presenting cases and in some specialities approaches 70%. In orthodox models, the flows of information and influence are between the brain and the body, so it seems mysterious how there can be deficits without physical damage. By postulating a pathway between the brain and the soul, we have opened up the possibility of another mechanism that can malfunction and lead to neurological symptoms.

That said, the disruptive physical psi effects provide the clearest evidential clues, so we will concentrate on those at this stage. NDE experiencers widely report that since their NDE, their presence causes interference, malfunctions or failures in electronic and electro-mechanical equipment such as radios, light sources, cell phones, security systems, toasters, VCRs, TVs, and so on. Here is an example report:

“Watches do not keep time for me. But mechanical things seem to work, even for no reason. If I get too close to FM radio frequencies I raise Cain with reception. Electronic equipment functions strangely around me. I touch electrical appliances to make them work. They start up with my energy. I blew my computer terminal when I got excited. [I] have burned up three cassette recorders [and] one overhead projector”.

Melvin Morse has found that wristwatches were unreliable for 25% of adults who survived childhood NDEs, whereas the same is true for only 4% of adults who have never had an NDE or paranormal experience. In fact, NDErs reported every kind of such effect more frequently than these control groups. Nouri also found that the depth of the NDE correlated with the frequency of these after-effects.

Overall, the electromagnetic nature of these side-effects supports the idea that soul-body interaction is mediated by physical forces and that these involve at least electromagnetic fields. We therefore infer that it is logically plausible that the soul has physical properties in addition to psychonic ones and that soul-body interaction, being based on physical fields, is naturalistic. 

 

David Rousseau & Julie Billingham, “On evidence for the Possibility of Consciousness survival.” Footnotes have been deleted for these excerpts, but a full paper is available at https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php. David Rousseau is a British systems philosopher, Director of the Centre for Systems Philosophy, chair of the Board of Trustees of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, a Past President of the ISSS, and the Company Secretary of the British Association for the Study of Spirituality.

Beyond a reasonable doubt: Beischel excerpt #20

When I asked the Windbridge mediums, “Do you believe in an afterlife?” as part of the ‘secret media project’ they knew nothing about, Traci Bray, who worked in and around law enforcement prior to focusing on her mediumship full time, chose to respond this way: “Yes. Were I presented this question in a court room, I would vote along with beyond a reasonable doubt.” But how does scientific evidence fit in a court system? 

 

Although “they evolved independent of each other to serve similar functions,” the decision-making schemes in both law and science share extensive similarities. For example, the threshold level of probability used by scientists to determine whether or not to reject a null hypothesis can be equated to the ‘standard of proof’ threshold used in a court system to determine whether or not proof beyond a reasonable doubt has been established. Furthermore,  

 

The structure of the decision situation is the same. Each reflects a true state of reality, which can never be known directly, but must be inferred (that a defendant is innocent or guilty; that a null hypothesis is true or false). 

 

When scientific findings are used as evidence in court, their “falsifiability,” the extent to which they can be contradicted by observation, is considered “the supreme criterion of authenticity”. 

 

There are also important differences between law and science. The philosophy stating that ‘law seeks justice and science seeks truth’ has been “announced by many legal authors and applied by several courts” and is based on the fact that courts will exclude evidence (such as that which has been illegally obtained) and science will not (as long as ethical and methodological standards are adhered to). In addition, 

 

Law relies primarily on what scientists would consider unreliable anecdotal evidence in the form of oral testimony. Science finds its truths by making generalizations from a mass of events. Thus, its focus is often at a population level. In contrast, law seeks to resolve disputes between certain named parties. 

 

As stated above, this is a significant advantage of mediumship research in establishing evidence for survival: we can assess the phenomenon as demonstrated by multiple skilled participants, using peer-reviewed methods and controlled laboratory conditions, which result in generalizable conclusions; we do not need to rely solely on anecdotal testimony about individual reported experiences. 

 

Using these comparisons to law, it is clear that the statistically significant scientific evidence described above, collected under randomized, controlled conditions in order to address falsifiable hypotheses, meets if not surpasses what could be considered proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a court system. 

 

I will leave you with the rest of Traci’s response to my afterlife question: “In my personal life, I am very calm and assured about where at least parts of our soul travel to after the death of the physical body and I have no fear of death itself.” 

 

 

Dr. Julie Beischel is the Director of Research at the Windbridge Research Center. She received her PhD in Pharmacology and Toxicology with a minor in Microbiology and Immunology from the University of Arizona and uses her interdisciplinary training to apply the scientific method to controversial topics.  For over 15 years, Dr. Beischel has worked full-time studying mediums: individuals who report experiencing communication with the deceased and who regularly, reliably, and on-demand report the specific resulting messages to the living. References cited in her paper are deleted from these excerpts but a full paper with references is available at the Bigelow website (https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php).  

Living with the mystery: Beischel excerpt #19

Draw Conclusions from all the Phenomenology Research 

 

From the data collected during the UVO-I, -II, and -III Studies, we can assuredly conclude that what mediums experience as survival psi (communicating with the deceased) is statistically and in most other ways completely different than psychic readings for the living, the placeholder experience for the theoretical situation proposed by the somatic psi explanation. Most convincingly, from the quantitative PCI love data collected during the UVO-III Study under blinded conditions, we can conclude that the different ways mediums describe the two experiences cannot be solely a result of knowing which phenomenon they are talking about and consciously or unconsciously spinning the narrative to fit their needs.

 

And let’s season our hearty science with some tasty logical inference: When we consider the extensive experiences of people throughout history and across the globe who have ongoing relationships with the souls of the deceased, it is actually more logical to land on the survival side of the survival psi/somatic psi argument. It just makes more sense that these 21st century, American mediums are communicating with the deceased, like they say they are doing and like people have been doing for eons all over the world, rather than using psychic functioning to acquire information about the deceased. That is, in addition to the science, the history and ubiquitous nature of communication experiences allow us to infer that survival psi is a better explanation than somatic psi for the source of mediums’ accuracy under controlled conditions. 

 

Draw Conclusions from all the Research 

 

As established above, science is considered the most reliable, valid way of knowing. Based on the science described here, this is what we know: 

 

1.Certain prescreened mediums can report accurate and specific information about the deceased under controlled laboratory conditions that address normal explanations for the source of the information they report.

 

2. The anomalous source of that accurate information must involve psi. 

 

3. The two possibilities are that (a) they are communicating telepathically with the survived consciousnesses of deceased people (survival psi) or (b) they are using precognition, clairvoyance, or telepathy with the living to gather information about the deceased (somatic psi).

 

4. Twenty laboratory-tested mediums and over 100 self-identified mediums have reported that survival psi and psychic readings for the living (the surrogate for the somatic psi theory) feel different. Extensive qualitative and statistically significant quantitative phenomenological research supports their claims. 

 

5. Quantitative findings from blinded readings performed by laboratory-tested mediums for deceased and living targets specifically demonstrated that, at the very least, love is experienced to a greater degree during mediumistic readings for the deceased compared to during psychic readings for the living.

Taken together, these facts provide the best available evidence for the survival of human consciousness after permanent bodily death. As we have stated all along this journey, 

 

"With a combination of evidence for AIR and support that the use of survival psi during the mediumship process is phenomenologically or physiologically different from somatic psi under blinded conditions, it could be inferred that survival is the best explanation for the data."

 

The most logical explanation for the collection of data described above is that people can survive the death of their bodies and can communicate with mediums.

 

But how can that be? 

 

 While these conclusions may seem like heresy or profanity to some, controversial ideas can be the “key to scientific progress” and keeping them “at the scientific margins is strikingly at odds with the potential public impact such work could have”.

Moreover, competent scientists are comfortable with uncertainty and mystery. In Brida by Paulo Coelho, another novel I happened to be reading while writing this, Brida’s boyfriend explains to her the classic physics double-slit experiment that demonstrates that particles can inexplicably act like both particles and waves simultaneously. “You may not believe it, but it’s true,” he says. “It’s something scientists know but can’t explain.”

 

Brida asks, “What do scientists do when confronted by these mysteries?”

“They enter the dark night,” he responds. “We know that the mystery won’t ever go away and so we learn to accept it, to live with it... It isn’t explanations that carry us forward, it’s our desire to go on”.

 

Here’s to living with the mystery. 

 

Dr. Julie Beischel is the Director of Research at the Windbridge Research Center. She received her PhD in Pharmacology and Toxicology with a minor in Microbiology and Immunology from the University of Arizona and uses her interdisciplinary training to apply the scientific method to controversial topics. For over 15 years, Dr. Beischel has worked full-time studying mediums: individuals who report experiencing communication with the deceased and who regularly, reliably, and on-demand report the specific resulting messages to the living. References cited in her paper are deleted from these excerpts but a full paper with references is available at the Bigelow website (https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php).

Experiences of mediums: Beischel excerpt #18

Julie Beischel writes in “Beyond Reasonable: Scientific Evidence for Survival,” her prize-winning essay in the Bigelow Institute for Consciousness Studies competition:

WCRM Laura Lynne Jackson

 In a 2017 online survey study, one of the questions we asked the medium participants (14 WCRMs, 113 self-identified; n = 127) was, “What is your explanation for why you are a medium?” Love was mentioned in some of the responses. For example, one participant described their purpose as, “To help others. To bring Light and Love where there is darkness... We are all eternal beings of Light and Love, we can never be destroyed.”

A different survey question asked, “In your own words, describe your spirituality as it is related to your mediumship.” Qualitative analysis of the responses revealed a major theme that involved love. Participants’ statements included:

“I believe that life continues. Energy changes form but it never lessens or increases. I believe in a light/love in the universe, whatever we call it. People move on in a new form rather than dying and no longer existing.”

“...what I believe in is... levels of ascension and learning of dark to light based on soul growth, with love carrying over each lifetime, until you are purely good and at peace with the universe.”

Because of these types of statements, we specifically predicted that love would be experienced to a greater degree during the blinded readings for deceased targets when compared to blinded readings for living targets. Our prediction was confirmed when this specific analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in PCI love scores.

Let’s really take that in and metabolize it: Under controlled conditions, the mediums in this study felt more love when performing a blinded reading for a deceased target than they did when performing a blinded reading for a living target. All the mediums had was a first name. And dead people brought love to the party.

After collecting the UVO-III Study data, I also informally interviewed the WCRMs about their general experiences during psychic functioning and survival psi (mediumship readings). Referencing the overall differences between the two experiences, the WCRMs noted:

“It’s very different. It’s like listening to someone versus looking myself.”

“In a mediumship reading, it feels like someone is talking to me. With psychic readings, it’s information about someone.”

“With mediumship, I get to meet new people all the time. Psychic information is boring.”

The mediums’ comments also related to differences in how they actually perceive the information:

“With psychic information, I have to ‘squint’ from the inside out like to focus on something in the distance. When I do mediumship, it’s not squinting at all. It’s just receiving.”

“There’s a heaviness around the sensation of living people; like air compared to helium. The auditory aspect is much sharper when I’m perceiving someone who is deceased. Their energy is more like helium.”

These statements are similar to a finding from Roxburgh and Roe* who interviewed 10 Spiritualist mediums about their experiences and qualitatively analyzed the responses. The metaphor of energy was used by one participant “to make the distinction between a psychic link that is ‘static’ and ‘dense,’ and spirit communication that is ‘vibrant’ and ‘lighter’” (p. 33).

One WCRM discussed the spatial orientation of the information in response to my query:

“Somebody from the other side steps in to communicate on the right side of the ‘movie screen’ in my mind’s eye. Psychic information from the living comes to the left-hand side of the screen. The dad’s side comes on the bottom right-hand side and the mom’s side comes in the upper right-hand side of the screen.”

Several WCRMs discussed differences in their physical sensations:

“The physical feeling I get is a tingling or a pressure in my head when the medium stuff starts to happen or when they’re entering the room. I don’t get that at all during a psychic reading.”

“Physically, mediumship charges me up. It’s like having eight cups of cappuccino. It’s like a buzzing. I’ve learned I can’t do reading too late at night because I’ll just be up all night. It’s like a super-charge. Psychic information doesn’t do that.”

One WCRM spoke specifically about love:

[In mediumship readings,] “there’s more of a loving feeling. When I connect with somebody on the other side, everything’s happy and great. I feel like I don’t know who I am any more. I lose myself. My identity is gone. Who cares who I am? I’m just part of the universe; I’m part of love energy... It’s like I’m connecting with that sacred love, that universal love, on the other side even though it’s just in little tiny bits for a moment. Reading psychically is very different. I’m more aware of myself. It’s more grounded. It makes me feel alone.”

The UVO-III data collected under blinded conditions and these additional informal interview responses support the conclusions of the previous phenomenological research studies: mediums know what acquiring psychic information about the living feels like and communicating with the deceased feels different.

 

*Roxburgh, E. C., & Roe, C. A. (2013). “Say from whence you owe this strange intelligence”: Investigating explanatory systems of spiritualist mental mediumship using interpretative phenomenological analysis. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 32(1), 27– 42.

 

Dr. Julie Beischel is the Director of Research at the Windbridge Research Center. She received her PhD in Pharmacology and Toxicology with a minor in Microbiology and Immunology from the University of Arizona and uses her interdisciplinary training to apply the scientific method to controversial topics. For over 15 years, Dr. Beischel has worked full-time studying mediums: individuals who report experiencing communication with the deceased and who regularly, reliably, and on-demand report the specific resulting messages to the living. References cited in her paper are deleted from these excerpts but a full paper with references is available at the Bigelow website (https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php).