End of life experiences: Fenwick excerpt #10

Further evidence to support the theory that consciousness can in some form continue after death has been found in studying what appears to happen to people as they approach death

Occasionally, someone may have a premonition of their own death some time before it occurs, though this is rare. But about 80-90% of people who are dying see a vision of someone they loved so real that the dying person looks at them as if at a fixed location in the room, may talk to them, try to shake hands, or may clearly feel that the visitor is sitting on the bed. Often the visitor tells the dying they will be back to collect them when it is time for them to go. Without exception these experiences are positive and reassuring for the person who is dying and occur independently of drugs, pathology, or any physiological factors affected by the dying process.

These deathbed visitors seem to come to reassure the dying that all will be well and that dying is only a transition to a continuation of being. In some cases they accompany the dying person into a new, spiritual area, full of love and light, where they may see spiritual figures and other dead relatives. Often the dying seem to travel into and out of this area, and they are given to understand that this is where they will be going when they die. Relatives who overhear the conversation nearly always describe it as rational and lucid. Below Marie Dowdall describes what she saw while with her dying uncle:

“My uncle served in the First World War and experienced the horrors of the Somme. He had led a group of men, returned with only three survivors was badly injured and was awarded the Military Cross. When he was dying of cancer, my mother cared for him at home. One evening we were sitting with him when suddenly he leaned forward and stared across the room. He became very animated and looked very happy as he began to talk to people he could obviously see but we couldn’t, calling them each by name and saying how wonderful it was to see them again. It became apparent that they were some of the men who had served with him at the Somme and died there. There was a look of wonderment on his face and he forgot his pain. I didn’t see him conscious again, and he died a couple of days later.” (Fenwick & Fenwick, 2008).

The appearance of these visitors is often used by the palliative care team to comfort the dying and in one hospice in Canada the staff tell them about the possibility of deathbed visitors and encourage them to go with them if they are asked to do so.

Another very common experience reported by the dying is the transition in and out of another reality they describe as composed of light and love, and which they believe is their destination.

“My father was at my grandfather’s bedside, deeply distressed, but my grandfather quietly said to my father, “Don’t worry Leslie, I am all right, I can see and hear the most beautiful things and you must not worry.” And he quietly died, lucid to the end.” (Fenwick & Fenwick, 2008).

Deathbed visitors are occasionally seen by relatives or palliative care staff who are with the dying person and more frequently (though still rarely), by children.

Monika Renz

Recent work by Dr. Monika Renz, a palliative care physician working in Switzerland on cohorts of patients dying of cancer, has characterized the final stages of the death process, with a transition into light and love very similar to the ADE (Renz et al., 2018).

1. The cleaning and giving up of attachments.

2. The gradual crumbling of the ego structures of the mind and the dawning of non-dual consciousness where everything becomes a unity.

3. The final stage, death, characterized by experiences of light and love and movement towards a more cosmic sense of mind.

Deathbed coincidences

Some of the best evidence for the continuity of consciousness is the phenomenon of deathbed coincidences, in which a dying person makes a farewell visit to someone emotionally close to them. Often this is during a dream, or when the person suddenly wakes with an overwhelming realization that something is wrong, or that someone was trying to contact them. (Fenwick & Fenwick, 2008) found 66% of the visits described to them occurred either in dreams or on a sudden awakening from sleep.

Distance is no bar for these communications, and even being underwater can’t stop them. In October 1987 Terry Woods was serving in the Royal Navy on patrol as a Submariner:

“Two days after diving I was asleep in bed and had a very real dream that my grandfather had "died". All of our family were waiting and I was the last one to arrive. When I arrived my grandfather picked up my nephew's bike and said "that's it, I'm off" and pedaled off and disappeared. I woke up the next morning and told my best friend that "I had a really weird dream that my grandad had died".

Whilst on patrol submariners are never told of any bad news, so it was three weeks later that Terry was told about his grandfather’s death at approximately 3.00am on the 18th October 1987, when he was fast asleep 200 feet under the Atlantic ocean (Fenwick & Fenwick, 2008).

It is certainly not uncommon for people who are away from their families to have anxiety dreams about them, but Terry says the dream was very real and this, combined with the precise timing, adds weight to the idea that it was more likely to have been communication than coincidence.

The following coincidence was reported by an Australian mother whose son was a sailor. The transition to love and light is similar to the new reality described in the ADE.

I was suddenly awoken from sleep to feel something was wrong, then I saw a vision of my son (not a dream) walking slowly towards me. He was disheveled and dripping wet. As he got closer he slowly transformed and became surrounded by light. He then said “don’t worry mum I am ok” and slowly faded. I knew something had happened to him so I rang England the next morning to find he had been drowned in a sailing accident the night before (Fenwick & Fenwick, 2008).

Sometimes coincidence is a reasonable and rational explanation for these events. But in many of these accounts, both the accuracy of the timing and the strength of the emotional response make it much harder to attribute them to ‘just coincidence’. That seems much less reasonable or rational than the alternative explanation – that there is somehow a genuine connection between the people involved and that this contact is driven by the person who is ill or dying.

This suggests that there is a state at death or just after death in which the person has some kind of existence in which their personal consciousness – their ‘mind’ - somehow persists independently of their brain. We can find further corroborative evidence for this in the study of actual death experiences.

Some of the accounts of these deathbed visits are particularly interesting as they show apparent communication between a dying person and someone who is close to them emotionally but geographically far away.

“Our friend Sarah told us how she had been living in Florence for several months when one day, on her way back to her pension from an art class, she had a sudden, overwhelming feeling that something was wrong with her father – who, as far as she knew, was perfectly well and healthy at home in America. The feeling was so powerful that she began to run, feeling that she must ring home immediately and find out if anything was wrong. When she reached the pension a phone message was waiting for her, telling her that her father had died after falling down the cellar steps and broken his neck.” (Peter Fenwick: Personal Communication)

These experiences are usually brief and while some, like Sarah’s, give rise to a sudden strong conviction that someone they love is very ill or has died, other people simply have a feeling of uneasiness for no apparent reason, as in the following account by Kathie Guthrie.

“Sadly my brother was killed in a car crash some 20 years ago now. I had been at work intending to work till 5 o'clock. At 4.20pm I was so uneasy and began getting cross with myself I just packed up and went home despite really needing to stay at work for one reason or another. I found out at 2.30 am the next morning that my brother had been killed instantly by a drunk driver at 4.20pm.” (Fenwick & Fenwick, 2008)

Kathie would probably not have given a second thought to her feeling of uneasiness had she not discovered the exact moment of her brother’s death. It is ambiguous experiences like this which reinforce the view that they cannot be dismissed as simply coincidences, even when the feelings experienced are inexplicable and out of character, and the timing approximately correct – indeed uncannily accurate in this particular case.

To determine whether an experiences is coincidence or fact we devised a rating scale and used it to rate 100 coincidences reported to us in response to newspaper articles and broadcasts. We found that the experiences were all within half an hour of death but most were at the time of death as recorded by the hospice.

Non-local phenomena around the time of Death

A number of inexplicable occurrences are often reported at or around the time of death, for example clocks stopping, light in the room, shapes seen leaving the body and domestic pets seeming disturbed. These features suggest that dying is a very special event which seems to cross the boundaries of both time and space. 

 

 

“To Be And Not To Be. This is The Answer: Consciousness Survives,” essay for the 2021 Bigelow essay contest submitted by Dr Peter Fenwick & Dr Pier-Francesco Moretti, Dr Vasileios Basios, and Martin Redfern. The complete essay with footnotes is available at https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.

Actual death experiences: Fenwick excerpt #9

Dr. Fenwick resumes the stand:

There can be no evidence clearer than the personal testament of someone who has died. Thanks to the success of medical interventions following cardiac arrest, many people do return from something that would have been classified as dead 50 years ago- a state in which the brain has ceased to function, the heart has stopped and the person is to all intents and purposes actually dead. And some report experiences (ADEs) which suggest the existence of another state of consciousness, unavailable in our normal everyday world.

What happens during a cardiac arrest

The international definition of death is: no respiration, no cardiac output and absent brain stem reflexes. This is the exact clinical state after a cardiac arrest. Simultaneous recording of heart rate and brain electrical activity show that within 11 seconds of the heart stopping, the brainwaves go flat. You are clinically dead.

Consciousness is lost in a matter of seconds when the heart stops and may not be regained until hours to days after it restarts.

Even if cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) begins straight away, blood pressure will not rise high enough to establish an adequate blood flow through the brain. Doine Stub and Graham Nichol found that only 7% of cardiac arrest patients survived and most had some evidence of brain damage; and the mental state during recovery is confusional (Stub & Nichol, 2012).

The flat EEG indicating no brain activity during cardiac arrest and the high incidence of brain damage afterwards both indicate that unconsciousness is total. The brain can’t create images, so it should be impossible to have clearly structured and lucid narrative experiences and because memory is not functioning, if experiences did occur they should not be remembered. The brain does not begin to function again until the heart restarts. So in theory it is impossible for anyone in this state to a) experience or b) remember anything that occurred during it. And if an experience occurred during the gradual return to consciousness it would be confusional, and not the clear, lucid story which is characteristic of actual death experiences.

However, to muddy the waters some studies have found that in patients who are being monitored and have begun the actual death process, there is a sudden recurrence of brain activity, containing faster frequencies which may last up to five minutes (Lang, 1989; Grigg et al., 1987). Materialists have jumped on this as the explanation for the ADE. But this is random cortical activity which does not integrate different areas of the brain, and certainly could not restore consciousness.

Conventional science cannot explain how an ADE could occur at any point during the death process, and there are special difficulties in accepting that it happens when the ADErs say it happens — during unconsciousness. However, about 10% of those who survive a cardiac arrest report an ADE .

It is very difficult to judge the exact timing of an ADE during a cardiac arrest. But two prospective studies were of people who had had cardiac arrests and were resuscitated in coronary care units, where their medical records show exactly what had happened; the patients had the same medication and resuscitation procedures and could be questioned as soon as they were well enough (van Lommel, 2011; Parnia et al., 2001).

Aim of the studies

To discover:

·       How many patients had an ADE;

·       Whether the ADE was similar to the traditional near death experience.

• Exactly when the experiences occurred – was it before or during unconsciousness, during or after recovery?

Of the 63 cardiac arrest survivors interviewed, 89% had no memories and about 10% reported ADEs, which they said had occurred while they were unconscious. These ADEs were, as was expected, very similar to those NDEs already reported in the literature. The authors also found that the ADEs were not due to medication, electrolytes, blood gases, religious belief or any other cultural factors.

Other research groups have found similar results. In a Dutch study of 344 cardiac arrest survivors, 41 (about 12%) reported ADEs (van Lommel, 2011). Their occurrence was not influenced by the duration of unconsciousness or cardiac arrest, or by medication but more ADEs were reported in the group of survivors who died shortly after their experience. In another study a higher rate of 23% was reported (Schwaninger et al., 2002) about 10% were found by Greyson, (2003) , while others (Sartori et al., 2006) report about 25%. What is clear is that actual death experiences do occur in association with cardiac arrest, and their contents are similar to those reported in the NDE literature.

No studies have so far been able to provide definitive scientific proof of when an ADE occurs. Parnia, with Fenwick and others (Parnia et al., 2001) found that the patients themselves felt that the experiences occurred during unconsciousness - important because, as discussed above, we have no idea how clear consciousness can be experienced during a period of clinical death with a flat EEG. This question is absolutely crucial to one of the biggest problems facing neuroscience: is consciousness entirely a product of brain function and is it confined to the brain? ADE research is perhaps the most promising way of filling the ‘consciousness gap’ in neuroscience. From the point of view of science, the ADE cannot occur during unconsciousness, and yet there is tantalizing evidence that that is just when they do occur.

The out-of-body evidence

About a third of ADEs are preceded by an out of body experience in which the experiencer says they leave the body and rise to the ceiling and can see the resuscitation taking place. Anecdotal evidence points to the OBE and therefore the ADE occurring during unconsciousness. Certain subjects even described their own resuscitation procedures accurately, suggesting that their ADE had occurred when the brain was ‘down’ (Sabom, 1982).

Dr. Penny Sartori studied a group of cardiac arrest survivors in a coronary care unit, several of whom said they had left their bodies and witnessed the resuscitation process. She compared their accounts of their resuscitation with those of another group of patients who had had no ADE during their resuscitation but were asked to describe what they thought had happened. It is usually argued that everyone sees so much resuscitation on TV that they know the procedure. Dr. Sartori was able to show convincingly that the patients who claimed to have seen their resuscitation, described it much more accurately than those who could only guess what had happened and who made significant errors (Sartori et al., 2006).

The case of Pamela Reynolds, described in the BBC’s documentary film “The Day I Died”, (Broome, 2002) is worth quoting at length because it seems so clear that even the most ardent debunkers have been unable to produce a satisfactory explanation for it.

Pamela had to undergo surgery to remove a cerebral aneurysm situated deep in the central structures of her brain. The operation was carried out in a specialized neurosurgery center under close medical monitoring during the entire operation. Her brain was cooled and EEG electrodes measured her brain activity. When the anesthesia had reached sufficient depth, the brain was known to be non-functioning. Pamela was clinically dead. Her circulation was taken over by a heart lung machine, the blood was emptied from her brain and the neurosurgeons removed the aneurysm. Then the heart was restarted, and the wound was closed.

After the operation Pamela made several observations about what she had ‘seen’ during it which were acknowledged by the medical team to be correct. The best skeptics have been able to come up with to rebut this was that it was a case of ‘anesthesia awareness’, which does indeed occur under some circumstances, but is impossible in cases such as this when the brain is emptied of blood and clinically dead. Far more significant is the following comment on the case, from the British Medical Journal.

“There is still much scientific work to be done before we can confidently suggest mind-body separation during the NDE. Dr Spritzer, the neurosurgeon who operated on Pam Reynolds, stated that he could not explain her NDE in the physiological state she was in, commenting 'I don’t want to be so arrogant to be able to say that there is no way it can happen'. Let us hope that all those engaged in NDE research can adopt a similar attitude.” (BMJ-editorial, 2003).

 

“To Be And Not To Be. This is The Answer: Consciousness Survives,” essay for the 2021 Bigelow essay contest submitted by Dr Peter Fenwick & Dr Pier-Francesco Moretti, Dr Vasileios Basios, and Martin Redfern. The complete essay with footnotes is available at https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.

Near death experiences: Fenwick excerpt #8

Advocate for the Afterlife: "In this session we present some of the most compelling evidence for the afterlife and ask Dr Fenwick to resume the stand:"

   Raymond Moody       

Dr Fenwick: In 1973, Dr. Raymond Moody, in his seminal book 'Life after Life' (Moody, 1975) made one of the most interesting, controversial and importantobservations of the 20th century when, he observed that ‘consciousness’ somehow seemed to exist while the patient was unconscious during a heart attack. It was this concept that stimulated the field of near-death research, and raised questions about the generally accepted, reductionist view of science that consciousness is created by and limited to a brain.

Most subsequent studies have been retrospective, questioning people and examining their medical records sometime after their experience. Michael Sabom (1982) examined patients who had been in a variety of near-death circumstances, such as severe traumatic injury or comas as well as cardiac arrests. Some claimed to have seen their own resuscitation procedures while unconscious and, correlating their accounts with the medical records, Sabom found that the evidence did indeed point towards the experience having occurred during unconsciousness.

The term ‘Near Death Experience (NDE) has come to refer to a wide range of experiences: those occurring during a true cardiac arrest, when the patient may actually be medically, though temporarily, dead; those in which they have been literally near death, in an accident or illness; those which result from extreme fear – the so-called fear-death experiences; and those which are part of a transcendent continuum in which death is not involved.

To clarify the terminology, Dr. Sam Parnia, a palliative care physician, has suggested that the term ADE – Actual Death Experience should be used for those experiences occurring during cardiac arrest when the person would have died had they not been resuscitated (Parnia et al., 2001). In this chapter the term NDE is used only for conditions which do not fit this classification.

Near Death Experiences

Studies in the USA and Germany indicate that 4.2% of the population have had an NDE and that more than 25 million people worldwide have had one in the last 50 years.(van Lommel, 2011). Since 1997, an entire journal has been devoted to their study, the ‘‘Journal of Near Death Studies’, (JNDS, 1987).

The features of these experiences vary, but the most common are: 

·  ineffability,

·  timelessness,

·  awareness of being dead,

·  out of body experience,

· being drawn through a tunnel towards a light,

· meeting other human spirits, often deceased relatives,

· often in a beautiful garden,

· a life review,

· a feeling of peace and a sense of harmony or unity with the universe,

· awareness of a boundary beyond which they cannot go,

· a feeling of being pulled back to the body because it is not their time to go.

· Sadness at having to leave something so beautiful.

Time in an NDE does not move in a linear fashion. Your life can be reviewed in a fraction of a second. Both past and future can be known. Using NDEs as a model, it seems that, in life after death, time is variable and flexible.

Advocate for the Afterlife: We would now like to call as a witness Dr Pier-Francesco Moretti, who experienced an NDE after a car accident:

Moretti:

I remember a vision from above my car ..... many people were there.... as luminous presences which made me feel a sort of peace and sense of acceptance, even though I was aware that I was close to death. I remember lying on the ambulance bed...... I told my friend that I had a strange dream. When he told me... we had a car accident, I immediately heard the noise of the ambulance and felt a terrible pain.

I was reluctant to report what I remembered. I was reading physics at university and trying to frame my experience within scientific theories. When my friend described the sequence of the events, I realized that my story was filtered by a logical interpretation that I introduced later. My perception was looking at events simultaneously, like pictures on a screen.

After that, I started to read accounts from people in coma of the 'out of body' aspects, the presence of light and the absence of a temporal sequence, framing them in the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics. I did not answer all the scientific questions, but I felt that death is a passage to another dimension with no separation between masses and times. I am no longer worried about dying, because I am just experiencing my identity as a human body localized in space and time, here and now. I am convinced that when I die I will experience another form of identity, free from fear and pain. My grandmother said that that dimension should be good, since no one came back to complain.

 

 

“To Be And Not To Be. This is The Answer: Consciousness Survives,” essay for the 2021 Bigelow essay contest submitted by Dr Peter Fenwick & Dr Pier-Francesco Moretti, Dr Vasileios Basios, and Martin Redfern. The complete essay with footnotes is available at https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.

Cross-examination: Fenwick excerpt #7

Judge: Now, the counsel for the skeptics may cross-examine the witness.

Elizabeth and Peter Fenwick      

Q: You say that close friends and relatives sometimes experience the presence of loved ones who died recently. Surely this could be hallucination brought on by grief, and if two close people are grieving the same relative, is it not unsurprising that they both dream of him?

A: True. These are death bed coincidences. In some, the person who is dying goes to visit someone to whom they are emotionally attached. What is surprising is that it occurs at the time of death, the two dreamers may be far away from each other, and may not even know that the relative is dying. And it is also surprising that they should both have very similar dreams at the same time on the same night.

Q: You admit there are fraudulent mediums. Couldn't they all be frauds but some cleverer than others? And if not, why do they like to work in darkness?

A: Broad brush refutation is unhelpful. Detailed examination is needed. Some of the most successful mediums have been physically examined even to the extent of having body cavities searched. They have been chained so they could not move and the experimenters have ensured that neither the medium's hands nor their feet have moved. However, the mediums were still able to produce ectoplasm and induce levitation and other physical phenomena. Mediums say it is very difficult to produce physical phenomena with normal lighting.

Q: Couldn't most mediums just be good at cold reading - or even, if it's possible, telepathic exchange with the sitters?

A: Some mediums have been rigorously tested. In the test situation the medium does not know who the sitter will be and never sees them because they are in a different room. As for telepathy, certainly this could be a factor, but from the reductionist science point of view, would not this be simply exchanging one impossible hypothesis for another? Telepathy can also be ruled out as we have been given examples of sitters who were given information they did not know, but later discovered was true.

Q: The supposed voices heard over faulty radios and faces seen in TV 'snow' are always faint and hard to make out. Aren't they just interference plus the brain's tendency to find pattern in randomness, just as we see faces on the Moon or in clouds?

A: What is required is detailed analysis of the data. Sometimes patterns are hard to make out but on other occasions they are very clear and unequivocal and loud voices have appeared from a non-functioning radio even to skeptical Scientific American writers! (Shermer, 2014).

 

References and Bibliography 

 

Batcheldor, K. (1966). Report on a case of table levitation and associated phenomena. Journal Of The Society For Psychical Research, 43(729), 339-356. Retrieved 12 August 2021. 

 

Brackett, E. (1885). Materialized Apparitions. ebook, Project Gutenberg (www.gutenberg.org/files/34475/34475-h/34475-h.htm). 

 

Braude, S. (2016). Journal Of Scientific Exploration, 30(1), 27-55. Retrieved 4 July 2021, from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/299109580_Follow- Up_Investigation_of_the_Felix_Circle.

 

Cardoso, A. (2017). Electronic Contact with the Dead: What do the Voices Tell us?. White Crow Books.

 

Colvin, B. (2010). The Acoustic Properties of Unexplained Rapping Sounds. Journal Of The Society For Psychical Research, 73(2), 65-93. 

 

Fenwick, P., & Fenwick, E. (2008). The Art of Dying. Continuum.
 

Geley, G. (1923). Materialized Hands. Scientific American, 129(5), 316-374. Retrieved 12 August 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24974719. 

 

Kean, L. (2017). Surviving Death: A Journalist Investigates Evidence for an Afterlife. Three River Press.

 

Keen, M., Ellison, A., & Fontana, D. (1999). The Scole Report. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 58, 150-452 

 

Peres, J., Moreira-Almeida, A., Caixeta, L., Leao, F., & Newberg, A. (2012). Neuroimaging during Trance State: A Contribution to the Study of Dissociation. Plos ONE, 7(11). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049360 

 

Shermer, M. (2014). Anomalous Events That Can Shake One’s Skepticism to the Core (original title "Infrequencies"). Scientific American, 311(4), 97. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1014-97.

 

Tymn, M. (2021). No One Really Dies: 25 Reasons to Believe in an Afterlife. White Crow Books.

 

Varvoglis, M. (1999). The Kluski Hands Moulds. Institut Métapsychique International. Retrieved 4 July 2021, from https://www.metapsychique.org/the-kluski-hands-moulds/.

 

 

“To Be And Not To Be. This is The Answer: Consciousness Survives,” essay for the 2021 Bigelow essay contest submitted by Dr Peter Fenwick & Dr Pier-Francesco Moretti, Dr Vasileios Basios, and Martin Redfern.The complete essay with footnotes is available at https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.

Mediums and materialization: Fenwick excerpt #6

Even long after death, communication between the dead and the living seems possible, through an intermediate interpreter or communication channel. One of the first people to experience and write about these phenomena as unrelated to religious belief was Edward Brackett, in his 1885 book Materialized Apparitions.

The Scole Experiment

     Robin Foy       

The Scole experiment which took place at the end of the 20th Century, set out to see if mediumistic information was due to fraud or genuinely came from spirits. It was carried out by senior members of the Society for Psychical Research in England, who studied a group of four people and two mediums, known as Robin Foy’s group, at the Scole farmhouse. Every possible precaution was taken. Their controls were numerous, and lights were attached to the mediums to prove that they did not move during the séance. The ‘spirits’ could ‘write’ on unexposed film , produced light in the room of the séance and information that only the sitters could know. The Scole report concluded that there was sufficient experimental evidence to suggest the continuation of life after death. (Keen et al., 1999)

Doris Stokes was one of the best known and well-regarded clairaudient mediums of the 20th century. She would always openly admit if she lost contact with the spirit voices, or received no messages from them, and was so successful that it is not surprising that she received hostile criticism from the most vocal sceptics of the time. A friend of ours, Pauline, who lived in America, went to see her on impulse one day when she was visiting London. The accuracy of most of the statements made by Doris Stokes in this session, about the life of someone from a different continent who she had never met before, was such that it is beyond the bounds of probability that it was achieved by guesswork or fakery.

1. “Barbara and Sheila say hello.” This, the first statement Doris made, is telepathy and not after death communication. These were the friends Pauline was living with in New York.

2. “There’s a man here, Charles, who wants to talk to you.” Pauline’s recently dead father was called Charles. The voice and rhythm of his speech were his, though his cockney accent did not come through.

3. “Fred and Alice are here too.” These were Pauline’ grandparents.

4. “And Paddy came just after me” Pauline’s uncle who had died soon after her father did.

5. “And your brother Peter’s here.”

This was a puzzle. Pauline had never, as far as she knew, had a brother called Peter. But because the rest of the information was so accurate, she went over to see her mother in Ireland. When she questioned her mother she was told, rather reluctantly, about the abortion, back in Ireland at a time when such things were neither legal nor socially acceptable. The baby would have been a brother for Pauline. And they had chosen a name for him: Peter. (Personal Communication).

The evidence that mediums can contact dead spirits is now incontrovertible, and examination of mediums' brains during a séance shows that the brain state is significantly different from both the control state and imagination (Peres et al., 2012).

Materialization and the Kluski gloves

In the early part of the 20th century materializations were very much in vogue and ectoplasm was often created in séances. The most convincing of these experiments was carried out with Franek Kluski, a Polish medium. A bowl of paraffin wax was melted over a bath of warm water. Kluski materialized an ectoplasm hand and asked the spirit to dip this hand into the wax and slowly withdraw it. When the wax had cooled this was repeated a number of times until, at the end of the séance, the medium dematerialized the hand and a perfect cast of it was left in the wax. Seven moulds of child-sized hands with the markings of adult hands, one of a foot and one of a lower face were produced in this way (Geley, 1923).

The Institut Métapsychique International conducted a detailed examination of this experiment to see if the results could have been fraudulently produced, either by sleight of hand during the séances, or moulds prepared in advance and surreptitiously smuggled into the laboratory (Varvoglis, 1999). Both seemed implausible because the experiment was so well controlled and they concluded that “...the Kluski wax gloves are genuinely paranormal, constituting evidence for an extraordinarily developed form of psychokinesis.”

Table levitation and psychokinesis

“To abandon these spiritual phenomena to credulity, is to commit a treason against human reason. Nevertheless, we see them always rejected and always reappearing. They date not their advent from yesterday.” – Victor Hugo. (cited in Brackett, 1885)

Psychokinesis – movement of physical objects without apparent human intervention – is one more phenomenon which seems to defy our scientific norms. Batcheldor (1966) describes sessions of table levitation by groups of sitters in which one six pound table levitated six feet, beyond the reach of the group, and another weighing forty pounds produced “brisk movements and levitations.”

An interesting experiment to see whether table levitation might be a human-generated phenomenon is described by Leslie Kean, in her book Surviving Death (Kean, 2017). Leslie was part of a team invited by Stephen Braude to examine table levitation facilitated by Kai Muegge, a German medium. Five of them sat with Kai around a plastic garden table. (Braude, 2016)

During the sessions Leslie and Steve sat on either side of Kai, holding his hands and touching his legs so that he could not physically move the table.

“We experienced a lot of table tilting and erratic circular movement. But it was the longer more relaxed levitations that really stood out. One of them lasted about fifteen seconds. The table rose at least two and a half feet straight up...swayed and dipped as if rocking on wave in what seemed like a swimming motion. It was as if it had suddenly become light and fluid, floating effortlessly, almost ‘alive’. (Kean, 2017)

They were also aware of other odd physical phenomena - raps as if someone was knocking on the wall, and the ringing of a bell which was hanging from the ceiling – which occurred spontaneously while they were all still sitting round the table. Leslie Kean (2017) and Stephen Braude (2016) also draw attention to a paper comparing the waveforms of paranormal rapping sounds with those of human-produced sounds. (Colvin, 2010). The sound amplitude of a human knocking on a wall is strongest the moment the sound begins and then quickly decays, whereas in a paranormal rap the sound starts quietly, builds to a maximum and then decays. See diagram in p.278 of (Kean, 2017).

The investigation of spirits has now gone a stage further, by using modern technology. Anabela Cardoso, was founder and editor of the ITC Journal Instrumental Transcommunication, which includes EVP (electronic voice phenomena) and DRV (direct radio voices). She has been able to show that spirit voices came from either the white background noise of a radio, or of a radio that was not working. A television camera pointed at itself or looking into a mirror has produced a lot of random moving dots. Sometimes these dots weave themselves into an image and have been claimed to be a form of spirit communication (Cardoso, 2017).

The evidence for an afterlife is strong (Tymn, 2021). For a few days after their death there seems to be an interim period when people may be able to communicate with those who were close to them in life. And even when separation from this life is complete, communication between the living and the dead seems possible through Mediums.

 

“To Be And Not To Be. This is The Answer: Consciousness Survives,” essay for the 2021 Bigelow essay contest submitted by Dr Peter Fenwick & Dr Pier-Francesco Moretti, Dr Vasileios Basios, and Martin Redfern.The complete essay with footnotes is available at https://bigelowinstitute.org/contest_winners3.php.