Chopra suggests: “Blind faith and blind unbelief have other attributes in common. They both refuse to be tested. They condemn the other side. They depend on strong emotional attachments. The main difference is that unbelief disguises its blindness behind a veil of reason.
“Faith is a stage on the way to true knowledge of God. By that standard, blind faith is questionable but not fatal—far from it. As a mystical act, blind faith can open up subtle aspects of the mind. It can lead to an expanded view of reality and allow a person to see himself or herself as multidimensional, existing on other planes beyond the physical.
“Any form of us-versus-them thinking strikes me as bad faith. Religions draw into tight camps where their God is the only true God, for tribal, political, and theological reasons. I find none of them justified."
Chopra agrees with the statement by physicist David Bohm: “In some sense man is a microcosm of the universe; therefore what man is, is a clue to the universe.” Chopra adds, “Since the only universe we can know comes to us through our minds, it may be that our minds shape reality."
Nonetheless, he explains, “We need to be clear about a very basic point: The visible universe isn’t the same as reality. When solid objects are reduced to atoms and then to subatomic particles, they are not longer solid. They are clouds of potentiality. As physics defines it, potentiality is neither matter nor energy but completely intangible, no matter how solid a mountain may be or how powerful a lightning bolt. Particles in such a state aren’t even particles anymore. They do not have a specific location in space; instead, every particle emerges from quantum waves that can extend infinitely in all directions."
Furthermore, “Dark energy is enlarging the space between galaxies faster than the speed of light. So something beyond space and time serves as the major force for creation and destruction in the cosmos, and whatever it is, it will be as invisible as mind, God, the soul, and higher consciousness.
“A universe that is meaningless can’t be divine. Random activity undermines all sense of purpose. A mind that arose out of electrochemical activity can’t know revelation or epiphany. The choice, for once, does come down to either/or. To me, it is self-evident that spiritual experiences exist, that we act out of free will, and that our lives have meaning. One might claim, with deep conviction, that ‘natural religion’ grew out of human experience, age upon age.
“Science doesn’t describe reality, because no school of philosophy has ever proved that the physical universe is real. (Even Stephen Hawking, no believer in God, has attested to this.) We assume that physical things are real, on the evidence of the information that enters through the five senses. But that is the same as saying that we accept reality subjectively.
“The surprising result is that God is on a level playing field with stars, galaxies, mountains, trees, and the sky. None of them can be objectively validated. ‘This rock feels hard’ is no truer than ‘I feel God’s love.’ But it’s no less true, either, as feeling is one sure way to navigate through the world.
“We are all embedded in the worldview of materialism; therefore the assumption that spiritual experiences must be unreal has become an article of faith. To love God isn’t different from loving science, if that is what shapes your life at its very core. In bad faith, we insist our beliefs should define reality for everyone. In good faith, we make the most of what we love and desire no less for everyone."
Deepak Chopra, The Future of God (2014), 1-92.
No comments:
Post a Comment